Started By
Message

re: Alright, I'm done. Anderson needs to go.

Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:10 am to
Posted by ElDawgHawg
L.A. (lower Arkansas)
Member since Nov 2012
2993 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:10 am to
At what point is someone going to address player development. Look at the upperclassmen.
Madden was a 4 or 5 star.
Scott was a 4 star.
I want to say Wade was a 4 star.
Can we honestly say they have gotten better? You could argue that Madden has this year but I wouldn't say it's the yearly progress you would have expected. Mwade and Scott have regressed if anything. I hope I'm not the only person that can see this. And looking at this year's class it is hard to believe we have a lot of help coming from two 3* and a 2*.
Face it people, our program is pretty friggin bad.
Mike shouldn't have to shoulder all the blame, but I certainly don't think we've made a major improvement either..... and that is on him.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33427 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 10:24 am to
Beard is a 4 star and Thompson is a 3 star, get your facts straight before you try to make a cogent argument.

And if you don't think we've made major improvement since Pel then you don't follow Arkansas basketball very closely.
This post was edited on 1/29/14 at 10:26 am
Posted by cigsmcgee
LR
Member since May 2012
5233 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Can we honestly say they have gotten better? You could argue that Madden has this year but I wouldn't say it's the yearly progress you would have expected.


Madden looks like a different player this year. We saw glimpses in the last month of last season, but he's exceeded expectations. Gulley is much bettter this year, and qualls too, until this months rut.

To pin MAs coaching on the lack of talent evident in scott and wade is just dumb.
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42397 posts
Posted on 1/29/14 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

At what point is someone going to address player development. Look at the upperclassmen.
Madden was a 4 or 5 star.
Scott was a 4 star.
I want to say Wade was a 4 star.
Can we honestly say they have gotten better? You could argue that Madden has this year but I wouldn't say it's the yearly progress you would have expected. Mwade and Scott have regressed if anything. I hope I'm not the only person that can see this. And looking at this year's class it is hard to believe we have a lot of help coming from two 3* and a 2*.
Face it people, our program is pretty friggin bad.
Mike shouldn't have to shoulder all the blame, but I certainly don't think we've made a major improvement either..... and that is on him.


Madden was rated as a PG, a position he does not play well, but is serviceable. He couldn't not play the position the past two years before improving his handles like he has this year.

quote:

Madden was a 4 or 5 star.



Madden was a 3* on most services, rated as a 3 point threat, a shot he has refused to take the past two seasons.

quote:

Scott was a 4 star.



Rated as a defender and slasher who could develop into a scorer, he can't make a lay up or free throw, that is all on him, a guy his size should hit 90% from the line not 50%.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter