Started By
Message
re: Mizzou vs Old Myth
Posted on 11/11/13 at 9:41 pm to DMagic
Posted on 11/11/13 at 9:41 pm to DMagic
I didn't use the transitive property. I mentioned a common opponent. It can be instructive but is obviously not foolproof.
I suspect we have too many good receivers and are too balanced with the run/pass for you all. And I expect our ends to do well against your young OL. And though our secondary isn't great, Wallace isn't either. So I think we match up well.
But yeah. Transitive.
I suspect we have too many good receivers and are too balanced with the run/pass for you all. And I expect our ends to do well against your young OL. And though our secondary isn't great, Wallace isn't either. So I think we match up well.
But yeah. Transitive.
2
Posted on 11/11/13 at 9:43 pm to the808bass
LSU was pretty "well-balanced" coming to Oxford as well fwiw.
Now they're on "tDecline"
Now they're on "tDecline"
Posted on 11/11/13 at 9:44 pm to the808bass
Our recievers are just as good and unless Freeze runs Scott we will score on your defense. LSU(better offense), A&M(better offense), and Bama(better again) only threw one TD against our defense compared to five interceptions. But please continue
They also all have better RBs and OLines than you
They also all have better RBs and OLines than you
This post was edited on 11/11/13 at 9:45 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News