Started By
Message

First Battle of Civil War was Battle of Blackjack b/t Missouri & Kansas Forces
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:54 am
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:54 am
The Battle of Blackjack was fought in Kansas in 1856 between northern abolitionists and southern border ruffians (ie. Missourians) five years before the Battle of Fort Sumter.
Many credible and respected historians credit the Battle of Blackjack (not the Battle of Fort Sumter) as the first battle of the American Civil War, or rather, the first battle in the War of Northern Aggression.
You can go ahead and thank Missouri for lighting the powder keg against the northern marauders. You can thank us for setting the stage for secession.
You're welcome.
NOTE: Mark Twain once upon a time famously remarked, "The Missouri black flagging ruffians never formally surrendered unlike the Confederates. In Missouri, surrender occurred when a native son was decapitated by the sword or axe. Only then could a Missourian be considered 'surrendered'."
Many credible and respected historians credit the Battle of Blackjack (not the Battle of Fort Sumter) as the first battle of the American Civil War, or rather, the first battle in the War of Northern Aggression.
You can go ahead and thank Missouri for lighting the powder keg against the northern marauders. You can thank us for setting the stage for secession.
You're welcome.
NOTE: Mark Twain once upon a time famously remarked, "The Missouri black flagging ruffians never formally surrendered unlike the Confederates. In Missouri, surrender occurred when a native son was decapitated by the sword or axe. Only then could a Missourian be considered 'surrendered'."
This post was edited on 10/25/13 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:55 am to mizzoukills
quote:
War of Northern Aggression.
Now you catching on.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:55 am to mizzoukills
What was the issue? Were the redlegs caught card counting? The bastards.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 11:57 am to mizzoukills
quote:
The Battle of Blackjack was fought in Kansas in 1856 between northern abolitionists and southern (Missouri) border ruffians five years before the Battle of Fort Sumter.
Sorry brah, no body cares what happened between Mizzou and Kansas before, during, or after the Civil War.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:01 pm to theGarnetWay
Historians care enough to designate the Battle of Blackjack the first battle of the Cival War.
That's pretty significant.
That's pretty significant.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:02 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Historians care enough to designate the Battle of Blackjack the first battle of the Cival War. That's pretty significant.
Why don't you worry about Clowney's arse obliterating another one of your QB's instead of posting this worthless shite on a Friday....
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:02 pm to mizzoukills
how long must we fight this war? or are you pandering? if pandering, i had no idea most people gave a shite about it nowdays. i guess some southeners are still looking for the relatives of the yankees that stole their great, great, great grandmothers silver but most southeners ancestors didn't even have any fricking silver.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:03 pm to TabledTiger
Clowney who? What?
Are you talking about Halloween?
Are you talking about Halloween?
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:05 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
Historians care enough to designate the Battle of Blackjack the first battle of the Cival War. That's pretty significant.
quote:
Result
Free-Stater victory
Congrats on the L. I guess historians will always have to credit the Battle of Fort Sumter as the first Southern victory then.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:07 pm to theGarnetWay
Y'all are still a bunch of yankees.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:08 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
What was the issue? Were the redlegs caught card counting? The bastards
and to top it off, the assholes didn't like tennessee whiskey.

Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:09 pm to kage
quote:
Y'all are still a bunch of yankees.
bunch of northern yankee meth-head peckerwoods
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:09 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
tennessee whiskey
They'll kill you in TN for calling it whiskey...
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:15 pm to mizzoukills
Nothing wrong with a little history lesson on a Friday afternoon. The Mizzu/Kansas border war was brutal, particularly for innocent families. If you read about it, you might find it interesting. Certainly, it was a foreshadowing of bad things to come in the Civil War.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:18 pm to LSU GrandDad
quote:
but most southeners ancestors didn't even have any fricking silver.
98+% didn't have squat.
Posted on 10/25/13 at 12:20 pm to dlc83
dlc83
Come on, man...I'm from Missouri. We grow up reading and learning about the Missouri/Kansas border war. We live and breathe it even to this day.
We know the TRUTH about those frickers from Kansas. Not the revised version that the goverment prints in history books to fit an agenda and specific narrative.
quote:
Nothing wrong with a little history lesson on a Friday afternoon

quote:
The Mizzu/Kansas border war was brutal, particularly for innocent families. If you read about it, you might find it interesting
Come on, man...I'm from Missouri. We grow up reading and learning about the Missouri/Kansas border war. We live and breathe it even to this day.
We know the TRUTH about those frickers from Kansas. Not the revised version that the goverment prints in history books to fit an agenda and specific narrative.
This post was edited on 10/25/13 at 12:54 pm
Popular
Back to top
