Started By
Message

Are Missouri and Texas A&M hurting the SEC reputation?
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:31 am
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:31 am
With Missouri and Texas A&M winning, does that weaken the perception of the SEC? I think it does, which is why I'm now cheering against both of these schools.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:33 am to tigafan89
quote:
With Missouri and Texas A&M winning, does that weaken the perception of the SEC? I think it does, which is why I'm now cheering against both of these schools.
7 National championships is unarguable.
Maybe A&M an Mizzou just aren't shite programs, doesn't change the above though.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:33 am to tigafan89
CSB
But no, it doesn't. I think most people realize A&M exploded onto the scene because of JFF. And what has Mizzou really done? They were terrible last year. They had a big win yesterday for them, but that was a depleted UGA team. Let's pump the brakes on Mizzou until they beat a couple more big time teams.
But no, it doesn't. I think most people realize A&M exploded onto the scene because of JFF. And what has Mizzou really done? They were terrible last year. They had a big win yesterday for them, but that was a depleted UGA team. Let's pump the brakes on Mizzou until they beat a couple more big time teams.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:34 am to tigafan89
quote:
tigafan89
Negatiger is butthurt
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:34 am to tigafan89
quote:
With Missouri and Texas A&M winning, does that weaken the perception of the SEC? I think it does, which is why I'm now cheering against both of these schools.
No it isn't. The reason you are cheering against A&M is because you are envious of us.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:34 am to tigafan89
Fun fact: Missouri has 4 total SEC wins against Georgia, Vanderbilt, Tennessee and Kentucky.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:35 am to tigafan89
Team big 12 staaaaaaaacked
SEC fuuuuuuuuuuuuucked
SEC fuuuuuuuuuuuuucked
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:35 am to tigafan89
No more than the empty seats at Tiger Stadium.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:35 am to tigafan89
Tamu has a heisman winner as part of the sec, so...
As for Missouri, aren't we still within the buy back period?
As for Missouri, aren't we still within the buy back period?
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:35 am to roguetiger15
This thread is pretty insane 

Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:35 am to tigafan89
Texas A&M has a freak at QB
and Mizzou just beat a UGA who is not nearly potent as they could be right now...and I'm not even sold on them yet and just picked up their 4th SEC win.
and Mizzou just beat a UGA who is not nearly potent as they could be right now...and I'm not even sold on them yet and just picked up their 4th SEC win.
This post was edited on 10/13/13 at 11:37 am
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:37 am to JordonfortheJ
Your maths is bad.
I saw that...
I saw that...
This post was edited on 10/13/13 at 11:38 am
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:38 am to tigafan89
quote:
With Missouri and Texas A&M winning, does that weaken the perception of the SEC?
Dafuq?

Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:40 am to tigafan89
tigafan89 is so dumb, it took him 2 hours to watch 60 Minutes.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:40 am to bigpapamac
quote:
They had a big win yesterday for them, but that was a depleted UGA team.
WHO frickING CARES?!
Mizzou was depleted ALL YEAR, last year. Don't see you all using that as an excuse for why we did bad.
Posted on 10/13/13 at 11:44 am to bigpapamac
quote:
But no, it doesn't. I think most people realize A&M exploded onto the scene because of JFF. And what has Mizzou really done? They were terrible last year. They had a big win yesterday for them, but that was a depleted UGA team. Let's pump the brakes on Mizzou until they beat a couple more big time teams.
We still outscored Georgia 13-0 with a freshman backup QB.
Popular
Back to top
