Started By
Message

re: Missouri's future vs. Tennessee's future.

Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:45 pm to
Posted by SunHog
Illinois
Member since Jan 2011
9202 posts
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

It's just one piece of the puzzle though.



I think you're over looking this a little. If you aren't pulling in 5* running backs and or QB's along with loaded 4* lineman you better have some serious player development. I'm not talking about keeping up with the average number of sending players to the NFL. You would need to be well above average to win in this league.

Y'all have a chance to branch out to all those B1G kids in Illinois that no one else is close to besides Kentucky. I would heavily look at what Kentucky has been doing in the past and do the opposite. Y'all are basically mirror images of each other yet Missouri doesn't have a Louisville in the state. (Bonus)

Kentucky has been sitting underneath Ohio (tons of talent) yet never seemed to capitalize and the same could be said for y'all about Illinois. Mizzou needs a game in Illinois or at least in St. Louis against Illinois just like Arkansas is in Texas.


This post was edited on 10/1/13 at 8:46 pm
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19279 posts
Posted on 10/2/13 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Kentucky has been sitting underneath Ohio (tons of talent) yet never seemed to capitalize and the same could be said for y'all about Illinois. Mizzou needs a game in Illinois or at least in St. Louis against Illinois just like Arkansas is in Texas.


Illinois has reportedly approached MU about starting the series up again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter