Started By
Message
My Computer Top 25: Week 5, 2013
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:05 am
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:05 am
Week 4 Thread
(open image in new tab for a larger view)
Rank, [AP Rank], Team, (Previous Week)
1. [1]--Alabama (1)
2. [6]--Georgia (11)
3. [3]--Clemson (3)
4. [19]-Michigan (2)
5. [11]-Oklahoma (18)
6. [14]-Miami (Fl) (5)
7. [4]--Ohio State (15)
8. [13]-South Carolina (NR)
9. [24]-Ole Miss (4)
10.[15]-Washington (13)
11.[5]--Stanford (10)
12.[20]-Texas Tech (8)
13.[12]-UCLA (9)
14.[NR]-Virginia Tech (NR)
15.[10]-LSU (6)
16.[23]-Fresno State (19)
17.[NR]-Houston (25)
18.[8]--Florida State (22)
19.[NR]-Missouri (22)
20.[NR]-N. Illinois (NR)
21.[7]--Louisville (16)
21.[16]-Northwestern (16)
23.[25]-Maryland (NR)
24.[9]--Texas A&M (NR)
25.[2]--Oregon (NR)
21/25 of my computer's top 25 are also in the current AP top 25 poll, with Alabama and Clemson perfectly agreed upon.
SEC Rankings: 7/14 are in top 25
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
8. South Carolina
9. Ole Miss
15. LSU
19. Missouri
24. Texas A&M
31. Auburn
36. Florida
45. Tennessee
58. Vanderbilt
66. Arkansas
73. Mississippi State
92. Kentucky
I'll try my best to rationalize your bickering
(open image in new tab for a larger view)
Rank, [AP Rank], Team, (Previous Week)
1. [1]--Alabama (1)
2. [6]--Georgia (11)
3. [3]--Clemson (3)
4. [19]-Michigan (2)
5. [11]-Oklahoma (18)
6. [14]-Miami (Fl) (5)
7. [4]--Ohio State (15)
8. [13]-South Carolina (NR)
9. [24]-Ole Miss (4)
10.[15]-Washington (13)
11.[5]--Stanford (10)
12.[20]-Texas Tech (8)
13.[12]-UCLA (9)
14.[NR]-Virginia Tech (NR)
15.[10]-LSU (6)
16.[23]-Fresno State (19)
17.[NR]-Houston (25)
18.[8]--Florida State (22)
19.[NR]-Missouri (22)
20.[NR]-N. Illinois (NR)
21.[7]--Louisville (16)
21.[16]-Northwestern (16)
23.[25]-Maryland (NR)
24.[9]--Texas A&M (NR)
25.[2]--Oregon (NR)
21/25 of my computer's top 25 are also in the current AP top 25 poll, with Alabama and Clemson perfectly agreed upon.
SEC Rankings: 7/14 are in top 25
1. Alabama
2. Georgia
8. South Carolina
9. Ole Miss
15. LSU
19. Missouri
24. Texas A&M
31. Auburn
36. Florida
45. Tennessee
58. Vanderbilt
66. Arkansas
73. Mississippi State
92. Kentucky
I'll try my best to rationalize your bickering
12
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:07 am to Harry Caray
quote:
4. [19]-Michigan (2)
quote:
I'll try my best to rationalize your bickering
Begin please.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:08 am to Harry Caray
looks pretty good to me
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:08 am to Harry Caray
quote:I like
19.[NR]-Missouri (22)
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:11 am to Harry Caray
quote:
14.[NR]-Virginia Tech (NR)
ha
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:20 am to Harry Caray
Looks like its coming together. Looking forward to seeing it in a couple weeks.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:22 am to Harry Caray
Do you recalculate points each time you do pod swaps?
That seems to be the one flaw I can find. If, lets say LSU beat TCU, who at the time was tier 1 in week one, and TCU ends up going 5-7. LSU would end up having a tier 1 win for that game even though TCU could have fallen to tier 6 or 7.
That seems to be the one flaw I can find. If, lets say LSU beat TCU, who at the time was tier 1 in week one, and TCU ends up going 5-7. LSU would end up having a tier 1 win for that game even though TCU could have fallen to tier 6 or 7.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:53 am to Harry Caray
Interesting and intriguing.. UT @ 45 throws me off.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 12:55 am to Harry Caray
Interesting metric you are using for the rankings. I do have three questions.
1. When you calculate the scores are they recalculated based on every team performance that week then added to their total? Or do you start from 0, use your metric and change the values to reflect wins or losses to spit out the numbers and which pod teams are in.
2. When you factor in wins or losses on the road, to which value do you multiply or divide the 1.5?
3. If all of Michigan opponents have a negative value, mathematically, how are they number 4? Not sure if I'm following the procedure corectly but this could be answered by commenting on the first questions.
Again good job and please continue this every week if time allows.
1. When you calculate the scores are they recalculated based on every team performance that week then added to their total? Or do you start from 0, use your metric and change the values to reflect wins or losses to spit out the numbers and which pod teams are in.
2. When you factor in wins or losses on the road, to which value do you multiply or divide the 1.5?
3. If all of Michigan opponents have a negative value, mathematically, how are they number 4? Not sure if I'm following the procedure corectly but this could be answered by commenting on the first questions.
Again good job and please continue this every week if time allows.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 1:43 am to Harry Caray
quote:
UT @ 45 throws me off.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 2:17 am to Harry Caray
quote:
this is bullfrickin shite fk ur computer
Posted on 10/1/13 at 6:23 am to Harry Caray
quote:
25.[2]--Oregon (NR)
Posted on 10/1/13 at 8:44 am to Harry Caray
I can surmise from this that only one spot counts.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News