quote:
And what in the wide world of frick does that have to do with this year? Missouri beating us in 2007 or 2010 has no more merit than A&M beating you in 2006. It's a new year with a new team, new staff and new ideas about what is expected of this program both interally and externally.

If we're talking historically, A&M has had considerably more success than Missouri in the last 50 years. Mizzu has one conference title and three divisional titles in that time. A&M has ten conference titles and three divisional titles. A&M has won almost 60 more games in that span despite our recent struggles. We have twice as many consensus all-americans.

Either way, this year or historically, there's no real comparison. You have to go back to our days as a service academy to make them comparable.

I love my double standard aggies.

When you tell them they are 76-37 vs The UT. They immediately say in recent times the record is closer.

But when the shoe fits, they like to use full history (as Klarvtard just did).

Glad you won those titles in the SWC. Who was in that league by the way? You had one, maybe two schools on your level in that league, the rest were little chumps.

And I see you've now totally ignored how stupid your point about Bowling Green and UL vs FLA was... nicely played.

This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 3:58 pm

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by AggieJohn06

Fort Worth

Member since Aug 2011

444 posts

Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:00 pm to mograyback

Well this thread gave me a headache... Less talk, more action.

C Note bet with any Mizzou fan on here. Straight up. No points, no excuses. Call me out, and I'll share contact info.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Roger Klarvin

DFW

Member since Nov 2012

46543 posts

Posted on 11/13/12 at 4:03 pm to mograyback

quote:
When you tell them they are 76-37 vs The UT. They immediately say in recent times the record is closer.

Except you clearly don't pay much attention, because Texas has dominted us over the last ten years too. A&M is talking about the time since we stopped being a required service school in the 60s, the exact same time frame I'm using for you.

A&M is close to .500 against Texas over the last 50 years (23-27 I think) which is not nearly as skewed as the total record accumulated while we were a small all-male school where all of of our players were required to serve their country after graduating. And that is the same time frame I'm using for you.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by WestCoastAg