Started By
Message
2
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:17 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
LSU wins in Baton Rouge. A&M wins in College Station.
How can this even be supported other than some strange desire to appear unbiased?
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:21 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
So the same amount A&M had till we switched our defense to the 3-2-6?
And only 7 more than A&M's inexplicably shitty kicker left on the field, too!
This is fun.
And check that, the TAMU offense hasn't turned it over at all since LSU.
This post was edited on 11/12/12 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:23 pm to DWag215
quote:
And only 7 more than A&M's inexplicably shitty kicker left on the field, too!
I'm happy the majority of LSU fans don't blame every loss on the kicker.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:25 pm to cashag95
LSU
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:27 pm to Tiger Authority
Not at all.
Hell I don't know who'd win. That's the point.
But nothing about TAMU since the LSU game suggests a rematch "wouldn't be close."
Why is it so hard for LSU fans to give props to what's a pretty damn good TAMU squad? shite's weird.
Hell I don't know who'd win. That's the point.
But nothing about TAMU since the LSU game suggests a rematch "wouldn't be close."
Why is it so hard for LSU fans to give props to what's a pretty damn good TAMU squad? shite's weird.
This post was edited on 11/12/12 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:30 pm to DWag215
I'm perfectly fine giving you props. I have no problems at all with that. But there is really nothing to support the conclusion that aTm is better than LSU at this point.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:30 pm to DWag215
quote:
And only 7 more than A&M's inexplicably shitty kicker left on the field, too!
Yeah your kicker is dog shite. But that is like saying we would have had a TD if the receiver had caught the ball. It is ridiculous to live in the world of hypothetical. He didn't make it, so it don't count. IF IF IF IF IF doesn't mean shite.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:31 pm to Tiger Authority
We're on the same page.
Like I said, no clue who's better now. There are perfectly reasonable arguments for both sides.
Like I said, no clue who's better now. There are perfectly reasonable arguments for both sides.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:33 pm to 10888bge
quote:
Yeah your kicker is dog shite. But that is like saying we would have had a TD if the receiver had caught the ball. It is ridiculous to live in the world of hypothetical. He didn't make it, so it don't count. IF IF IF IF IF doesn't mean shite.
The thread's topic asks IF a rematch happened...with IF being the operative word.
That requires analysis of the prior games which obviously calls for IF hypotheticals.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:37 pm to DWag215
quote:
Like I said, no clue who's better now. There are perfectly reasonable arguments for both sides.
Not really. LSU has improved far greater and won the first game. Regardless, we won the first game and won't play again so it doesn't matter. We're better.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:39 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
Not really. LSU has improved far greater and won the first game.
So where does that put us 3 weeks ago? A couple points worse than Bama?
But we're better than Bama now though, right? I mean, no question, huh? If so, and applying your approach, Bama must necessarily be better than LSU.
And round and round we go...
This post was edited on 11/12/12 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:40 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
If A&M played LSU in a rematch this Saturday, who wins?
Bama
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:42 pm to DWag215
quote:
So where does that put us 3 weeks ago? A couple points worse than Bama?
I don't know. I think your offense has been impressive most of the year absent LSU and second half of UF.
quote:
And we're better than Bama, right? I mean, no question, huh?
I think you are. I realize how you will turn this but I'll play.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:42 pm to DWag215
"I do not believe in rematches." sticky note found at NOLA Krystals in scrawled letters
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:42 pm to DWag215
quote:
But we're better than Bama now though, right? I mean, no question, huh? If so, and applying your approach, Bama must necessarily be better than LSU.
transitive logic? come on. You may not be better than this but I wish you were.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:43 pm to DWag215
quote:
And check that, the TAMU offense hasn't turned it over at all since LSU.
Neither has LSU.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:43 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
I think you are. I realize how you will turn this but I'll play.
We were better on Saturday, just as LSU was better than us October 13th, just as Bama was better than LSU two weeks ago.
We know that.
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:47 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
transitive logic? come on. You may not be better than this but I wish you were.
Come on. Obviously that post was draped in sarcasm--but also the end result of your logic.
According to you, LSU beat TAMU last month, therefore LSU is better today--no question.
But if beating a team in the past is the sole consideration when discussing who's better today, that has to mean Bama is better than LSU.
Of course this approach is ridiculous. The answer to the thread's question--the very stupid question--is that no one knows.
This post was edited on 11/12/12 at 10:48 pm
Posted on 11/12/12 at 10:47 pm to DWag215
I think we'd win by a lot more than we did a few weeks ago. We were still crappy on offense. I expect Manziel would struggle just as much.
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News