Started By
Message
re: How many seasons until aTm & Mizzou's OOC losses count against the SEC's rep?
Posted on 7/12/12 at 11:19 pm to Monticello
Posted on 7/12/12 at 11:19 pm to Monticello
0
Posted on 7/12/12 at 11:29 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
Texas A&M 3 times
You never mentioned them until now. I was wondering if you would.
Posted on 7/12/12 at 11:42 pm to Monticello
quote:
You never mentioned them until now. I was wondering if you would.
I mentioned them on Page 3.
Posted on 7/12/12 at 11:42 pm to BreakawayZou83
quote:
FWIW, we're 21-3 in non-conf.
Posted on 7/12/12 at 11:46 pm to Drewbie
Arkansas is also 21-3 OOC for the last five years.
Posted on 7/13/12 at 7:57 am to sasrocks
quote:
our OOC results will factor into the impression of the SEC around the country, beginning day one. Why is that so hard a concept to accept?
Posted on 7/13/12 at 8:41 am to UltimateHog
quote:
I already did, Boise State twice (something UGA couldn't do) and Texas in Texas.
Those were unranked Boise teams.
Posted on 7/13/12 at 8:43 am to Ray Penpillage
quote:
Arkansas is also 21-3 OOC for the last five years.
Yeah,Mo. State and ULM type victories. No powers.
Posted on 7/13/12 at 8:51 am to UltimateHog
quote:
Ark is the much much much better team.
I think it is fair to say that Arky is better right now than the Ags, but I don't believe they are "much much much" better. I expect that game to be competitive; the deciding factor will be how our DL depth develops.
I expect the Ags depth in the front seven to be an issue this year (and likely for 2-3 years); hence a winning record is all I personally hope for this year.
Just my opinion. It's worth what you paid for it. :)
Posted on 7/13/12 at 9:35 am to BreakawayZou83
quote:
Oh, we almost forgot the last 3 years of asswhipping Texas A&M OOC.
We suck and have sucked. That's not an accomplishment. So if you want to say we suck, then that's fine. But if we suck, they most certainly shouldn't be counted as good OOC wins.
Posted on 7/13/12 at 9:36 am to Drewbie
Lol one of them will finish better than Arky this year
Posted on 7/13/12 at 10:22 am to Drewbie
Um....yeah. Obvious troll is obvious.
The reason the SEC has its reputation is not because of the losses racked up by Vandy, Ole Miss, or Arkie in OOC. The SEC has WON the BCS NC 6 years in a row. A&M and Mizzou could both come in and be door mats, and as long as LSU, Bama, Georgia, Florida, or Tennessee continue to have NFL rosters top to bottom, the SEC will keep its prestige.
Now, with regard to the Pigs at Kyle, I think we have as good a chance to win as last year (should have won...by a lot). The game was in question until the last few minutes, at a neutral venue. Yeah, new staff, new QB, etc., but the core of the team is still here.
I give A&M an advantage because of the venue, but Arkie an equalizing advantage with Tyler Wilson (who is a badass and a future starting NFL QB). It will probably play out just like last year's game. Lots of points, down to the last possession.
The reason the SEC has its reputation is not because of the losses racked up by Vandy, Ole Miss, or Arkie in OOC. The SEC has WON the BCS NC 6 years in a row. A&M and Mizzou could both come in and be door mats, and as long as LSU, Bama, Georgia, Florida, or Tennessee continue to have NFL rosters top to bottom, the SEC will keep its prestige.
Now, with regard to the Pigs at Kyle, I think we have as good a chance to win as last year (should have won...by a lot). The game was in question until the last few minutes, at a neutral venue. Yeah, new staff, new QB, etc., but the core of the team is still here.
I give A&M an advantage because of the venue, but Arkie an equalizing advantage with Tyler Wilson (who is a badass and a future starting NFL QB). It will probably play out just like last year's game. Lots of points, down to the last possession.
This post was edited on 7/13/12 at 10:23 am
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News