Started By
Message
re: SC President proposes SC-Mizzou rivalry.
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:58 am to crispyUGA
Posted on 2/7/12 at 10:58 am to crispyUGA
Please tell me the last time UGA did something relevant?
Don't flatter yourselves in thinking you are on Florida, LSU, or Bama's level either.
ETA: Too much "please". Being too nice.
Don't flatter yourselves in thinking you are on Florida, LSU, or Bama's level either.
ETA: Too much "please". Being too nice.
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 11:01 am
1
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:00 am to CNB
I'll admit that we're a 2nd tier program, but don't try to act like y'all are anywhere close to UGA, either.
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:01 am to crispyUGA
Currently we are better. Is that so hard to understand?
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:01 am to crispyUGA
they made rings? 
Georgia is light years beyond South Carolina, two years isn't going to shake me to my core.
quote:
CNB
Georgia is light years beyond South Carolina, two years isn't going to shake me to my core.
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 11:02 am
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:02 am to Damn Good Dawg
I forgot. Georgia is the land where "currently" doesn't exist. It's always next year or last year. 
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:04 am to CNB
I'll give you that the past 2 years y'all have been better, but that doesn't change the past...and I like our chances this year with no Antonio Allen and no Melvin Ingram.
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:05 am to crispyUGA
You'll do much better handling Devin Taylor and Clowney.
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:06 am to CNB
quote:
I forgot. Georgia is the land where "currently" doesn't exist. It's always next year or last year.
South Carolina: the land where 2 years outweighs 100+ previous years
quote:
Crispy
i liked our chances even if they still had them, that's just gravy
ETA: i'd be more worried about our front 7 than clowney
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 11:07 am
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:06 am to CNB
Columbia perpetually remains one full calendar year ahead of the rest US...
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:07 am to Damn Good Dawg
I like our chances with Murray starting for you guys. And Mark Richt still coaching for you clowns. 
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:09 am to CNB
RIcht still has a winning record vs ya and Murray can easily be elevated when he has a pulse on the OL, a better backfield, with an even better group of WRs
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:10 am to CNB
Murray>Shaw
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:11 am to 2014cock
malcome, crowell, marshall, gurley, thomas > lattimore
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 11:12 am
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:12 am to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
malcome, crowell, marshall, gurley, thomas > lattimore
You are fricking high or trolling.
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:12 am to CNB
perhaps both
ETA: but srsly, all of them can = latty and you know how outspoken i am with my man crush on that guy, i hate he is one of you horrid people
ETA: but srsly, all of them can = latty and you know how outspoken i am with my man crush on that guy, i hate he is one of you horrid people
This post was edited on 2/7/12 at 11:13 am
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:12 am to Damn Good Dawg
Lucky you. 
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:16 am to Damn Good Dawg
you know, I'll concede that the Cocks have the superior running game, but they have NO passing offense. They struggled to pass the ball with Alshon drawing a double team every down, so now that he's gone it should be even harder for the WR's they have to get open. That alone will cost them in games against teams capable of scoring a lot.
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:17 am to crispyUGA
not to mention it plays right into Georgia's strength
Posted on 2/7/12 at 11:19 am to crispyUGA
Now that Lattimore is back, our receivers will be able to get open easier. He's too dangerous to be ignored, and if he is ignored he'll make you pay.
Plus if we can beat you with fricking Garcia of all people, we can beat you with Shaw.
SC by 10.
Plus if we can beat you with fricking Garcia of all people, we can beat you with Shaw.
SC by 10.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News