Best team or more deserving team?

Bama is better, but they had their chance. OSU deserves a chance.

The Best teams should play.

Because of a screwed flawed system probally oaki state when we all know bama would drum roll them, TR would have probally 1000 yards. Bama is the only team that can beat us and vice versa. It's sad really that were in the same division and conference. It's like when the niners and cowboys always had to play in the Nfc championship game.
Better game no doubt bama
Almost Sure win Oki although anything is possible. In a fair system we get a buy and play the winner of bama ,Oki st. And I bet bama wouldn't have a problem with that but can't say the same about the cowboys.

With Bama LSU gets the best of both worlds!

The Tide is the best possible opponent and considering their lone loss was to a MUCH more impressive team than was OSU's debacle at ISU, Bama is the most deserving as well.

quote:

---

because they think Bama is the better team

---

There have been several years where it was generally assumed that the runner up in the SEC was a better team than the other team selected to face the SEC champ. Florida in 09' comes to mind. Not sure why this argument that suddenly the BCS should ignore conferences in the selection process has become such a talking point.

quote:

---

Best team or more deserving team?

---

Let's further define the question:

What do the rankings actually mean? A list, in descending order, of the best teams in the country, or a list of teams whose turn -- in fairness, mind you -- it is?

This mindset, taken to its most logical extreme, results in the team who didn't win being deemed the "second winner" instead of the loser.

Let's pussify sports a bit more, shall we?