Started By
Message
saying it now, % Chance Auburn has to give back the BCSNC
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:18 pm
I will say 80 percent.....
9
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:19 pm to HawgAlude
Deeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrp
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:20 pm to HawgAlude
You are the worst Arkansas poster, 100%.
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:21 pm to FleaMarketBill
Hes been ruled eligible even thou they admit rules were broken. So unless there is definitive proof that money changed hands I doubt they will have to give it back.
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:21 pm to HawgAlude
im say 55 only bc i give them a 55 percent chance of winning the game.
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:22 pm to RLDSC FAN
I 100% agree with marines
And as for him being ruled eligible, that doesn't mean that he was eligible for the first 12 games of the season.
And as for him being ruled eligible, that doesn't mean that he was eligible for the first 12 games of the season.
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:22 pm to bamaboy87
25%
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:23 pm to heartbreakTiger
dude who cares at this point?
Enjoy the bowl season and if it happens later on so be it!
Enjoy the bowl season and if it happens later on so be it!
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:23 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
And as for him being ruled eligible, that doesn't mean that he was eligible for the first 12 games of the season.
The NCAA said with the info they had now that Auburn didn't have to worry about vacating wins.
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:25 pm to TiggerWoods
quote:
The NCAA said with the info they had now that Auburn didn't have to worry about vacating wins.
Really? I never heard anything about the vacating wins part.
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:25 pm to TiggerWoods
They did not say that
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:26 pm to TiggerWoods
Nope Herbstriet said on the BCS show that he felt that more information could and probably will come forward. I think they know but just have not done it yet. However, How can I be the worst hog poster when everything I say comes true.
This post was edited on 12/5/10 at 10:27 pm
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:28 pm to HawgAlude
Given Auburn's record, I say they give back a lot. They're known to be very giving.
I typed : Auburn gives back into google and wouldn't you know, this is the first thing that popped up:
Check out the link:
Newton Gives Back - Auburn Family
absolutely precious. I salute you Cam Newton for all of your hard work in the community
I typed : Auburn gives back into google and wouldn't you know, this is the first thing that popped up:
Check out the link:
Newton Gives Back - Auburn Family
absolutely precious. I salute you Cam Newton for all of your hard work in the community
This post was edited on 12/5/10 at 10:29 pm
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:28 pm to HawgAlude
100 million %
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:30 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
They did not say that
It also temporarily eases concerns that Auburn's 12 wins - and any titles - would wind up being vacated if the NCAA had found that Newton had been ineligible because of violations committed before signing with the Tigers on New Year's Eve 2009.
Read more: LINK
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:31 pm to HawgAlude
oregon and bama are waiting to release even more. the next month they will keep auburn waiting and then release it in part of bamas evil plan to crush little brother
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:33 pm to heartbreakTiger
Based on the information available to the reinstatement staff at this time, we do not have sufficient evidence that Cam Newton or anyone from Auburn was aware of this activity, which led to his reinstatement. From a student-athlete reinstatement perspective, Auburn University met its obligation under NCAA bylaw 14.11.1. Under this threshold, the student-athlete has not participated while ineligible.”
This is on NCAA.org
This is on NCAA.org
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:36 pm to TiggerWoods
quote:
"Based on the information available to the reinstatement staff at this time, we do not have sufficient evidence that Cam Newton or anyone from Auburn was aware of this activity, which led to his reinstatement,"
They did not say that auburn doesn't have to worry about vacating wins. They can very easily come back and declare him ineligible in the future. It's happened before
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:37 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
They did not say that auburn doesn't have to worry about vacating wins. They can very easily come back and declare him ineligible in the future. It's happened before
Notice how I said based on the info they have so far...
Posted on 12/5/10 at 10:38 pm to HawgAlude
0%
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News