Started By
Message

re: NCAA had no choice

Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:01 pm to
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46720 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:01 pm to
You're half irght, IMO. NCAA didn't lower the boom because if they had ruled Cam ineligible then Cam's family, Auburn, and perhaps even the SEC would sue the hell out of the NCAA, creating a media firestorm and a lawsuit that would cost the NCAA millions. Like everything else with this case, this is a money issue, and letting Cam play while citing lack of evidence was the safe way to save cash and face with the SEC office
Posted by secftw
FL
Member since Jan 2010
3311 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

You're half irght, IMO. NCAA didn't lower the boom because if they had ruled Cam ineligible then Cam's family, Auburn, and perhaps even the SEC would sue the hell out of the NCAA, creating a media firestorm and a lawsuit that would cost the NCAA millions. Like everything else with this case, this is a money issue, and letting Cam play while citing lack of evidence was the safe way to save cash and face with the SEC office


So basically...

either way...

the Newtons are getting money for lying.

Okay just clarifying.
Posted by GeauxTigersLee
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2010
4644 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

if they had ruled Cam ineligible then Cam's family, Auburn, and perhaps even the SEC would sue the hell out of the NCAA

On what grounds? Enforcing the rules that are already on the books?
Posted by tigersruledude
Member since Oct 2005
1484 posts
Posted on 12/2/10 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

You're half irght, IMO. NCAA didn't lower the boom because if they had ruled Cam ineligible then Cam's family, Auburn, and perhaps even the SEC would sue the hell out of the NCAA, creating a media firestorm and a lawsuit that would cost the NCAA millions. Like everything else with this case, this is a money issue, and letting Cam play while citing lack of evidence was the safe way to save cash and face with the SEC office


The Newton family would NEVER sue over this. BIG DIFFERENCE between lying to NCAA investigators and getting on the stand at trial. A lawsuit would require them to testify under oath aas to:

1. Exactly what happened Cecil did and with whom.

2. Whether Cam knew or not.

3. Whether any money moved anywhere.

I tend to think these are questions that the Newton DO NOT WANT TO ANSWER UNDER OATH.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter