Started By
Message
4
Posted on 11/18/10 at 3:22 pm to ever43
and the Auburn beat writer has nothing to gain by breaking that either.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 3:25 pm to ever43
When TMZ came out with their report, Auburn fans insisted there was no way anyone could know what was in FBI wiretap logs.
Now that there are sources that favor Auburn, Auburn fans now suddenly believe that someone knows what is in the wiretap logs.......ponderous.....
Now that there are sources that favor Auburn, Auburn fans now suddenly believe that someone knows what is in the wiretap logs.......ponderous.....
Posted on 11/18/10 at 3:29 pm to ever43
First - Because his lawyer says he is not invovled with the Newton's we say ok?
Second - So he didn't talk about Newton on the wiretaps case closed. AU is off the hook?
Third - He didn't talk about paying Cam Newton on the wiretaps, doesn't say anything about other players.
Last - What does that matter. Cam is still ineligble.
Second - So he didn't talk about Newton on the wiretaps case closed. AU is off the hook?
Third - He didn't talk about paying Cam Newton on the wiretaps, doesn't say anything about other players.
Last - What does that matter. Cam is still ineligble.
Posted on 11/18/10 at 3:34 pm to ever43
quote:
Yes, I don't think the media ever uses unnamed sources in stories like this.
Right, but in the stories which are pro-Auburn, the unnamed sources are legit, but when the stories implicate Auburn, the sources are invalid because they are unnamed.
At least according to NGT...
This post was edited on 11/18/10 at 3:35 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News