Started By
Message
re: **Cam Newton investigation UPDATED Page 1 - 11/5, 1:30am**
Posted on 11/4/10 at 5:30 pm to DaleDenton
Posted on 11/4/10 at 5:30 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
No, but at this point they would have to vacate/forfeit 8 games so any chances at reclaiming bowl eligibility would be lost.
Because of this, is there any real reason NOT to play him the rest of the season? A ruling on his eligibility likely isn't going to come down before the end of regulation... and if he's ruled ineligible retroactively, what difference does it really make if the OFFICIAL record is 0-12 as opposed to 4-8?
1
Posted on 11/4/10 at 5:33 pm to chilge1
quote:
Because of this, is there any real reason NOT to play him the rest of the season? A ruling on his eligibility likely isn't going to come down before the end of regulation... and if he's ruled ineligible retroactively, what difference does it really make if the OFFICIAL record is 0-12 as opposed to 4-8?
This is true and the reason why you may see him continue playing.
The last school who did this was SMU, while fulfilling their monetary agreements with the players, the NCAA took acceptation to their actions in the matter.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News