Started By
Message
locked post

The difference between AU '10 and BAMA '09

Posted on 10/30/10 at 8:57 pm
Posted by RockyStop
Chainsaw City
Member since Jun 2008
4349 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 8:57 pm
BAMA could and did win without Ingram. Auburn CANNOT win without Cam. Just sayin'
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 8:57 pm to
omg onoes?
Posted by Vidic
Member since Jan 2010
9142 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 8:58 pm to
That's cool and everything, but they still have cam
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
52971 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 8:59 pm to
Is Cam injured or something?
Posted by nativetiger
Member since Jan 2007
2196 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 8:59 pm to
Qb > RB
Posted by WDChizik
Glendale, AZ
Member since Jan 2009
6052 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 8:59 pm to
Newton takes few hits. The differences between AU10 and Bama09 are plentiful.

UA Second team D in 09 = AU Starters.
This post was edited on 10/30/10 at 9:00 pm
Posted by WLHUNG
Member since Dec 2009
2028 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 8:59 pm to
They had a RB tonight with almost 200 yds rushing... just saying. They're going to curb-stomp you mofos.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48699 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

Auburn CANNOT win without Cam.


Saban will come up with some kind of Cam-Stoppin' Scheme.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33991 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

BAMA could and did win without Ingram.


When did we win without Ingram?
Posted by AUTigLN11
Marietta
Member since Mar 2010
4833 posts
Posted on 10/30/10 at 10:01 pm to
The difference is we have a real Heisman worthy stud on our team and not a guy who is going to quit on his team when they need him most because he has been getting wore out all day.
Posted by Buck Sweep
Member since Oct 2010
853 posts
Posted on 10/31/10 at 12:09 am to
quote:

Enjoying what I'm watching. History hasn't been kind(2004).


BRILLIANT. So glad you wasted the bandwidth with that nugget of bammer babble brilliance!

WHO GIVES A shite?
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 10/31/10 at 4:06 am to
Posted by Vince
Danziger Bridge
Member since Nov 2009
2223 posts
Posted on 10/31/10 at 9:24 am to
quote:

BAMA could and did win without Ingram.


Can you say the same for Mt. Cody?

Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37280 posts
Posted on 10/31/10 at 9:37 am to
Motha fukn right.
Posted by ottothewise
Member since Sep 2008
32094 posts
Posted on 10/31/10 at 9:59 am to
so what?

Notre Dame would not have beat Penn State in the Cotton Bowl without Joe Montana. Most college teams would flop without their premier QB. So?

You can probably list a dozen teams from past national champs which would not have even been in the top 5 without their QB.

Navy Staubach.

Would Bama have been number 1 without Stabler?
Penn State was also undefeated that year.






first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter