Started By
Message
locked post

With most of the big 12 teams going to pac 10 does SEC

Posted on 6/9/10 at 9:03 am
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
14522 posts
Posted on 6/9/10 at 9:03 am
go after a Acc team or go after say a louisville type?
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48958 posts
Posted on 6/9/10 at 9:03 am to
Posted by Camp Randall
The Shadow of the Valley of Death
Member since Nov 2005
15612 posts
Posted on 6/9/10 at 9:06 am to
If Slive ends up adding a team like Louisville he should be fired.

We have to endure his shitty refs...that's almost too much as it is.
This post was edited on 6/9/10 at 9:07 am
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
83548 posts
Posted on 6/9/10 at 9:08 am to
quote:

go after say a louisville type?



Posted by Old Smokey
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
3588 posts
Posted on 6/9/10 at 12:16 pm to
Nope. UT to the SEC!
This post was edited on 6/9/10 at 12:17 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263256 posts
Posted on 6/9/10 at 1:10 pm to
SEC will need to move quickly if the PAC10 gets OU, Texas, OSU, TT...and A&M. I don't see adding a Big East type team (outside of WVU) would benefit the SEC at all. I know there are some ACC teams on the radar as well, but most people think the ACC may survive because of their basketball prowess.

SEC would need to move on some solid, BCS competitive type teams pretty quickly or risk some serious loss of prestige and market share.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter