Started By
Message

Picture of new "DYNASTY" Sports Illustrated Cover
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:04 pm to superman
The definiton of "Dynasty" has changed dramatically in recent years.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:06 pm to roadGator
This is very German and I can speak for all Bama fans in saying that nobody believes we have a dynasty.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:06 pm to AuburnCPA
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:06 pm to AuburnCPA
That is fricking awesome! Hey ESPN, do you spit or swallow? 
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:06 pm to I Love Bama
Has the picture been posted already?
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:06 pm to roadGator
SI knows who spends their unemployment checks on college football team memorabilia.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:08 pm to superman
Just found the picture posted in another thread. Oh well. I love Blitzkrieg. 
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:10 pm to superman
shouldn't that say DENTISTRY?
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:20 pm to superman
Circa: Ming Dynasty
BTW: Isn't that a bit silly? I get sick of how the sports media seems to need to say "The Greatest" every year about some team. This is not an Anti-Bama post. Its an anti-lazy journalism post
BTW: Isn't that a bit silly? I get sick of how the sports media seems to need to say "The Greatest" every year about some team. This is not an Anti-Bama post. Its an anti-lazy journalism post
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:22 pm to superman
I actually gave them the benefit of the doubt when I saw the first pic. It was too small to read everything on the cover,so I had considered that they were maybe referring to the SEC as a form of dynasty...but now I see they really did explicitly say "Alabama"...
SI is retarded...
SI is retarded...
This post was edited on 1/12/10 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:28 pm to DvlsAdvocat
quote:
SI is retarded...
Maybe not...
A) regional cover meant for bama fans
or
B) cause enough controversy that Bama lovers and Bama haters will buy it all over the country
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:34 pm to superman
What everyone is failing to see (and rightfully so IMO) is that they are clearly asking the question...Can Alabama begin a dynasty and is there anyone that can stop them? They aren't saying that Alabama IS a dynasty. I will agree with everyone though. It is not clear at all what their intent is.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:35 pm to tuck
I took Dynasty as a statement or they would have put a question mark behind it I would think.
I'm so confused, I think I'll have a bourbon.
I'm so confused, I think I'll have a bourbon.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:36 pm to roadGator
Exactly. They should have, but they put it after the "Can anyone stop Alabama" statement.
This post was edited on 1/12/10 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:41 pm to tuck
I'm thinking that it was meant for the Bammers then since the proper use of punctuation was ignored and most Gumps would never notice. 
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:43 pm to roadGator
ALABAMA IS ON THE LONGEST IN SEASONS WINNING STREAK IN COUNTRY THEY CAN NOT BE BEAT DURING REGULAR SEASON ONLY IN CHAMPIONSHIP OR BOWL GAMES.
There I said, are you happy?
There I said, are you happy?
Posted on 1/12/10 at 4:43 pm to superman
i love it. the si jinx is about ready to unleash its nasty venom on ya'll. i'm not kidding. not to mention the complacency and overconfidence aura that will soon settle over the program. dynastys are very short these days. florida is the closest thing we've seen in awhile.
Latest Texas A&M News
Back to top

12






