re: POLL>>>>

B

I think the ref was blocked an never saw the play and I think the replay guy definitely blew it. I would be hard pressed to intelligently argue the refs favor Bama based solely on 1 game. But, look at all the big games Bama has won the last 2 years and the close calls for Bama. First I can recall offhand was Ole Miss last year. Bama seems to consistently lead the league in least penalties AND in most penalties against opponents. That's pretty dang freaky at best.

But, I think it is unfair to dwell too long on the penalties. LSU and most schools know going in that you have to beat Bama solidly to win at BD. Bama played a VERY good game and looked good after the bye. No one knows if LSU would have won if the bad calls had not happened.

quote:

---

POLL>>>>
So, how many of you believe that the controversial interception call was:

a.) A good call.

b.) Should have been overturned by video evidence.

c.) was correct as there was not enough evidence to overturn the call.

d.) believe that the referees were helping fix the game for Alabama.

Just so we know where everyone stands.

Another interception thread. kms.

---

I say:

e.) it does not matter, the game has been over more than 24 hours (Didn't learn the Saban rule yet?)

b and d

B

d sounds like the most reasonable answer to me since every talking head on every Sports program had Bama and Fla. undedeated and playing in the SEC CG, then the winner playing in the NCG. All of the above before the gameday arrived, then the "no calls", and the "bad calls". Then again all this could be co-incidence.
I've never been so sick after watching a football game like I was after that game; win or lose.