Started By
Message
Auburn fans are a bunch of female genitalia.
Posted on 9/21/25 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 9/21/25 at 10:36 pm
Thomas launching (still not targeting) on his first sack and grabbing the facemask (he didn’t) on the safety have now been added to their whine list. SMH.
3
Posted on 9/21/25 at 11:01 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
They are coming up on poke level of whininess. It is entertaining though.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:48 am to Gimme Vaughn
They are the worst I’ve ever encountered in all my years not counting whorn or poke fans.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:12 am to OU Guy
No matter what evidence is presented they are traumatized and will never admit it. This outrage allows them to ignore their problems and the loss.
Their admin started it by claiming fake titles so making false claims is now ok because their school supports it.
They can’t get over the problem lies with SEC not OU. They made their bed early and often and can’t adjust to facts.
The SEC office is also wrong and I do think they need to be forthcoming with the info from refs.
OU checked before the game and during the pre play and refs said it was fine. But to a fanbase not able to use critical thinking they won’t apologize or change their stance.
I laugh thinking about them at water cooler while at work and doing nothing but saying how bad they were robbed. And when their players read their social media all week that rubs off and they will not prepare as hard for atm this week because their minds are consumed with this one play.
It’s fun seeing them post like bots on the other boards. Makes me smile knowing how worked up they are.
Their admin started it by claiming fake titles so making false claims is now ok because their school supports it.
They can’t get over the problem lies with SEC not OU. They made their bed early and often and can’t adjust to facts.
The SEC office is also wrong and I do think they need to be forthcoming with the info from refs.
OU checked before the game and during the pre play and refs said it was fine. But to a fanbase not able to use critical thinking they won’t apologize or change their stance.
I laugh thinking about them at water cooler while at work and doing nothing but saying how bad they were robbed. And when their players read their social media all week that rubs off and they will not prepare as hard for atm this week because their minds are consumed with this one play.
It’s fun seeing them post like bots on the other boards. Makes me smile knowing how worked up they are.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 8:21 am to Gimme Vaughn
quote:
They are coming up on poke level of whininess. It is entertaining though.
I said this yesterday, it is clearly obvious that they are, at heart, lil bro's. It is in their very nature.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 10:52 am to OU Guy
The visiting team's defensive back failed to do his assignment.
Any good DB would pay attention to the opponent's hot WR - but Auburn blew it on that down.
It was a blown coverage - that's all.
I hope the Auburn DC has enough sense to see that.
Any good DB would pay attention to the opponent's hot WR - but Auburn blew it on that down.
It was a blown coverage - that's all.
I hope the Auburn DC has enough sense to see that.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 7:13 pm to dustbowl
Posted on 9/22/25 at 9:00 pm to OU Guy
I'm not sure who Paul Wadlington is, but this sure shows that he is scared of this year's Sooner team.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 3:17 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
In addition to the eagle/tiger fans (which are they, eagles or tigers?) refusing to even acknowledge what is right in front of them, the league office wasted no time at all issuing a statement that it was an illegal play and OU should have been penalized, a pretty clearcut example of caving to the hysterical ranting of the Auburn fan base that started within minutes of the final gun.
Couple that with the network trotting out their analyst repeatedly saying the same thing about the play and ginning up the rest of the conference or at least most of it to now label the Sooner program as a bunch of cheaters has convinced me it is time for OUr fanbase to call for the Oklahoma Athletic Department begin proceedings to leave the SEC and join another conference or play as an independent.
In short, WE DON'T NEED THIS SH*T!
Go Sooners!
Couple that with the network trotting out their analyst repeatedly saying the same thing about the play and ginning up the rest of the conference or at least most of it to now label the Sooner program as a bunch of cheaters has convinced me it is time for OUr fanbase to call for the Oklahoma Athletic Department begin proceedings to leave the SEC and join another conference or play as an independent.
In short, WE DON'T NEED THIS SH*T!
Go Sooners!
Posted on 9/23/25 at 5:13 pm to JacieNY
quote:
(which are they, eagles or tigers?)
Plainsmen.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 7:25 pm to OU Guy
This was like analyzing the Zapruder film.
It's the 2nd quarter of a 3-3 game. Auburn attempted a punt but muffed the snap and the Sooners had the ball on the 12-yard line at the 11:35 mark.
On OU's play of the possession Mateer runs around the right side for a 4-yard gain but a holding call nullifies the play and at 11:29 it becomes 1st and 20
It's the 2nd quarter of a 3-3 game. Auburn attempted a punt but muffed the snap and the Sooners had the ball on the 12-yard line at the 11:35 mark.
On OU's play of the possession Mateer runs around the right side for a 4-yard gain but a holding call nullifies the play and at 11:29 it becomes 1st and 20
Posted on 9/24/25 at 7:29 pm to JacieNY
Now it gets interesting.
OU huddles then comes to the line. Burks is split wide left, Satagna goes in motion from the right and the ball is snapped at 11:12. Mateer hands off to Blaylock who runs from the right hash to the center of the field where he is taken down for a 2-yard loss by the defense at 11:07.
The clock continues to run.
OU huddles then comes to the line. Burks is split wide left, Satagna goes in motion from the right and the ball is snapped at 11:12. Mateer hands off to Blaylock who runs from the right hash to the center of the field where he is taken down for a 2-yard loss by the defense at 11:07.
The clock continues to run.
Posted on 9/24/25 at 7:44 pm to JacieNY
With the clock running, the network shows a close up of Arbuckle on the sideline, the Auburn band then another close up of Arbuckle. The play clock is down to 24 and at the 10:50 mark OU snaps the ball but the television audience doesn't see this, just the previously mentioned close up of Arbuckle.
What the viewers did not see was Oklahoma running up to the line to go tempo.
At the end of the previous play when Blaylock was tackled Sategna had motioned from the right side to the left and he continued to move that way as Burks ran a route.
When they lined up for 2nd down, Sategna had kept going towards the near side, Burks lined up now in the slot at the hashmark.
Missing the snap the network resumes showing the play on the field, Mateer is stepping back and throwing to his left. Burks has stepped two yards past the LOS and is waving his arms in a premature celebration at seeing Sategna alone inside the 5-yard line where he catches the ball and scores.
Remember OU was going tempo after the penalty on a drive that started with the handoff to Blaylock.
Teams going tempo do not substitute.
TEAMS GOING TEMPO DO NOT SUBSTITUTE.
So the idea that Sategna was running a fake substitution/hideout play don't make sense.
The Auburn defense reacted to the OU offense going tempo and lost track of Sategna.
What the viewers did not see was Oklahoma running up to the line to go tempo.
At the end of the previous play when Blaylock was tackled Sategna had motioned from the right side to the left and he continued to move that way as Burks ran a route.
When they lined up for 2nd down, Sategna had kept going towards the near side, Burks lined up now in the slot at the hashmark.
Missing the snap the network resumes showing the play on the field, Mateer is stepping back and throwing to his left. Burks has stepped two yards past the LOS and is waving his arms in a premature celebration at seeing Sategna alone inside the 5-yard line where he catches the ball and scores.
Remember OU was going tempo after the penalty on a drive that started with the handoff to Blaylock.
Teams going tempo do not substitute.
TEAMS GOING TEMPO DO NOT SUBSTITUTE.
So the idea that Sategna was running a fake substitution/hideout play don't make sense.
The Auburn defense reacted to the OU offense going tempo and lost track of Sategna.
This post was edited on 9/25/25 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 9/24/25 at 7:51 pm to JacieNY
After the PAT the network showed footage of Durkin after play and then of Freeze arguing with an official and doing the timeout motion to show that he had been trying to call a TO prior to the play.
It was then the network goes to their rules analyst who admits he cannot see Sategna and if all he was watching was what we were watching did not see OU approach the line going tempo but he proceeds to indict OU by declaring it an illegal play.
Now no Auburn fan on this board is going to read all this or accept it if they do but OU needs to submit the evidence to the league office, the one that reacted almost immediately to issue a statement about it and get a retraction and an apology from the network.
It was then the network goes to their rules analyst who admits he cannot see Sategna and if all he was watching was what we were watching did not see OU approach the line going tempo but he proceeds to indict OU by declaring it an illegal play.
Now no Auburn fan on this board is going to read all this or accept it if they do but OU needs to submit the evidence to the league office, the one that reacted almost immediately to issue a statement about it and get a retraction and an apology from the network.
Posted on 9/27/25 at 9:20 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
I find it funny. They lost to A&M and they're still complaining about it like it derailed their season. This is genuinely texsa levels of mad, love it. 
They said OU wouldn't make a mark on this conference, it's already year 2 and half of these teams skeered, wouldn't have it any other way
They said OU wouldn't make a mark on this conference, it's already year 2 and half of these teams skeered, wouldn't have it any other way
Posted on 9/27/25 at 11:12 pm to sharkbite
118 games vs. oSu.
31 games vs. aTm.
In ONE game, Auburn has proven itself to be aggier than both schools combined. I was not prepared for this.
31 games vs. aTm.
In ONE game, Auburn has proven itself to be aggier than both schools combined. I was not prepared for this.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News