Started By
Message
New NIL rules shite
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:06 pm
Don’t see it discussed anywhere. I was out of the loop for most of last week so I’m trying make sense of the ruling.
So each school can spend $20.5m that will increase over time but for now 20.5m to spend on athletes.
However athletes can still receive current NIL deals but they must be approved through the new clearing house to be approved as real revenue generating advertising and not just paying players. (I’m sure there will be zero greasing the palms in that scenario)
Each school can determine how much of that 20.5m can be divided up among all teams under the athletic director.
Am I missing anything?
So each school can spend $20.5m that will increase over time but for now 20.5m to spend on athletes.
However athletes can still receive current NIL deals but they must be approved through the new clearing house to be approved as real revenue generating advertising and not just paying players. (I’m sure there will be zero greasing the palms in that scenario)
Each school can determine how much of that 20.5m can be divided up among all teams under the athletic director.
Am I missing anything?
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:25 pm to CorchJay
quote:
Each school can determine how much of that 20.5m can be divided up among all teams under the athletic director.
Am I missing anything?
Tons how does that work for title 9.
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:28 pm to CorchJay
Give Bruce 20.5m until he gets it done.
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:34 pm to jangalang
quote:
Tons how does that work for title 9.
That’s why I was asking what I missed.
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:38 pm to CorchJay
quote:
That’s why I was asking what I missed.
damn! We are toast if neither of us know
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:39 pm to jangalang
We’ll get some dumbass in here that can’t read then frick everything up
This post was edited on 6/8/25 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:42 pm to CorchJay
Randy is turning you into a cynical old man
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:44 pm to jangalang
Randy is and always has been champs or bust
Posted on 6/8/25 at 6:56 pm to CorchJay
quote:
So each school can spend $20.5m
This
And
quote:
However athletes can still receive current NIL deals but they must be approved through the new clearing house to be approved
This sounds terrible
How will they enforce a clearing house saying yeah player A is or cannot make a certain deal offered by someone?
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:14 pm to HailToTheChiz
That’s how the powers that be want it. All the gray area.
Easy solution would be if you sponsor a kid at say Auburn you have to spend an equivalent amount on a player or players at 1 or multiple other schools.
All I know is I will be canceling OTV tomorrow
Easy solution would be if you sponsor a kid at say Auburn you have to spend an equivalent amount on a player or players at 1 or multiple other schools.
All I know is I will be canceling OTV tomorrow
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:28 pm to CorchJay
quote:
Randy is and always has been champs or bust

Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:41 pm to CorchJay
Also there are no more scholarship limits.
Apparently AU is planning on an additional 100+ athletic scholarships.
Apparently AU is planning on an additional 100+ athletic scholarships.
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:48 pm to PJinAtl
I wasn’t aware no limit on scholarships. I knew there was something surrounding walkons and the judge not wanting to do away with walkons opportunities
Posted on 6/8/25 at 8:50 pm to PJinAtl
quote:
Apparently AU is planning on an additional 100+ athletic scholarships.
So the donors will be sending money to the school for more scholarships instead of donating to OTV. Or maybe both.
Can you imagine what these smaller schools are going to have to do raising donations like Vandy, Miami etc.
Posted on 6/8/25 at 9:58 pm to CorchJay
So instead of trying to rein in the NIL shite and try to fix the situation, they basically make it way worse
Posted on 6/8/25 at 10:07 pm to LanierSpots
quote:allows for the University to bridge the gap if teams run out of NIL donors after a few seasons of lackluster results at top dollar. NIL will get old for money men once results dont bear fruit
So instead of trying to rein in the NIL shite and try to fix the situation, they basically make it way worse
Posted on 6/9/25 at 6:57 am to CorchJay
Will the teams who can’t deliver 20.5 million have a separate league of say 5 to 10 million?
How many athletic dept have 20.5 million to give?
Is it 50?100?
How many athletic dept have 20.5 million to give?
Is it 50?100?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:07 am to CorchJay
A couple of things I picked up from radio this morning.
Everyone is still not sure how Title IX plays in all this. They get around it now and “Revenue sharing” may be the key, but still not sure due to a judge or other entity determining how it plays out in a lawsuit.
They did say that the 3rd party company who reviewed and will be responsible for approving any deals above 600.00 from the co-OP’s, said 70% of the deals made under the co-ops would not have been approved.
In other words the co-ops that were just straight pay for play and not tied to companies using the NIL in advertising would be squashed based on what that company said
105 scholarships for Football and still allow walk-ins
34 scholarships for baseball
Didn’t hear what basketball is.
Everyone is still not sure how Title IX plays in all this. They get around it now and “Revenue sharing” may be the key, but still not sure due to a judge or other entity determining how it plays out in a lawsuit.
They did say that the 3rd party company who reviewed and will be responsible for approving any deals above 600.00 from the co-OP’s, said 70% of the deals made under the co-ops would not have been approved.
In other words the co-ops that were just straight pay for play and not tied to companies using the NIL in advertising would be squashed based on what that company said
105 scholarships for Football and still allow walk-ins
34 scholarships for baseball
Didn’t hear what basketball is.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 7:09 am
Posted on 6/9/25 at 7:10 am to makersmark1
quote:
How many athletic dept have 20.5 million to give? Is it 50?100?
152 school had a revenue over 20 million.
LINK
Latest Auburn News
Back to top
