Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

I just saw the Arizona St “no targeting” call

Posted on 1/5/25 at 10:04 am
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
41166 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 10:04 am
Didn’t watch the game but just looked up the call on YouTube

Obviously targeting lol.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35382 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 10:05 am to
We've all been anxiously awaiting your opinion, glad we can now put this matter to rest.
Posted by teamjackson
call me Walnut
Member since Nov 2012
7064 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 10:05 am to
Daniel
Posted by tBrand
Member since Oct 2022
3615 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Didn’t watch the game

yes you did
Posted by Opry
Member since Oct 2023
5581 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 10:10 am to
They tell the refs not to call targeting in the playoffs so they don't lose a player for any games.
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
39156 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 10:13 am to
No one gives a shite what you have to say

You’re the ginger who called a recruit a racial slur because he didn’t go to A&M
Posted by Mexican Martini
Member since Aug 2024
308 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:03 am to
It was targeting. Missed call.
They also missed a more obvious targeting on ASU and oh by the way we were stalling out drives on penalties so clearly refs not in the bag
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
35190 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:08 am to
quote:

texag7




Hey buddy. Long time no see. Yes, as usual you are correct, it was clearly targeting.

Hope you had a great Christmas
Posted by GatorOnAnIsland
Florida
Member since Jan 2019
9838 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:13 am to
SEC refs would have called targeting on this play

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.





Posted by GatorOnAnIsland
Florida
Member since Jan 2019
9838 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:13 am to
Posted by ElChupacabra
Member since Jun 2023
685 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:21 am to
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
11240 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:27 am to
Yup. It was absolutely targeting.
Posted by TexasOnTop
Member since Nov 2023
6633 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:28 am to
Posted by Longhorn Actual
Member since Dec 2023
3128 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:29 am to
quote:

They also missed a more obvious targeting on ASU


Shhhh...we're ignoring the targeting no-call for when the ASU defender quite literally launched himself/left his feet to attack the head/neck area of a 100% defenseless player.

We hate Texas (mostly stemming from insecurity and jealousy), so we're only going to whine about the call that could go either way - where the WR caught the ball and was turning up field, then was met by the safety who had his head up the entire time, making what amounts to a textbook tackle.

This post was edited on 1/5/25 at 11:30 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter