Started By
Message

re: UF and South Carolina, why don’t you want your rivals in SEC, again?

Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:29 am to
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
4692 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:29 am to
If adding Clemson and FSU would mean more money for each of the teams in the SEC, the SEC will add teams.

If it's the same money or less they won't.

The SEC believed Texas and OU would mean more money per team. It didn't work out that way. The ESPN per team payout remained unchanged. It just went up enough to cover Texas and OU's share.

Clemson and FSU have less money making potential that OU and Texas. They're not going to be added unless the situation changes and adding them guarantees more money for the existing SEC teams.

That's not because of SC or UF. It's because of all the SEC teams. Expansion needs to be financially beneficial for the existing schools for it to happen. Not as "potential" future earnings this time, but real promises of more money per team coming from ESPN.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24196 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

That's not because of SC or UF.


Shhhh. Just lie to me....
Posted by RocketBallz2
Member since Mar 2022
21 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

If adding Clemson and FSU would mean more money for each of the teams in the SEC, the SEC will add teams.

If it's the same money or less they won't.


Exactly right, the invisible hand of Adam Smith is finally at work.

We've had a century of inefficiency with desolate states like Oklahoma and Kansas getting 2 power conference paychecks. Now the market is finally correcting it and all you hear is crying from the teams that have had a century on the gravy train.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter