RocketBallz2
Favorite team: | Missouri |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 20 |
Registered on: | 3/6/2022 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Rank your school's rivals
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 4/24/24 at 10:57 am
For Mizzou I'd move Arky up to #2 and Illinois to #3.
As for NU and OU, it's been more of a hammer/nail rivalry historically, but going forward it could be more interesting with that sweet sweet SEC revenue. Mizzou should already be on even ground with NU. Will need to keep building to ever get...
re: Mizzou, Arkansas and OU
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 4/18/24 at 8:41 pm
Agreed, pretty embarrassing for Mizzou to be so close to a non power conference team in all time record. ...
re: Mizzou, Arkansas and OU
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 4/18/24 at 8:33 pm
Lets assume the favorite wins the games this year. It becomes:
Mizzou 12 Arkansas 4 >> .750
OU 66 Mizzou 23 >> .742
Much better.
The lesser team could always pull the upset, so good luck to all....
Mizzou, Arkansas and OU
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 4/18/24 at 8:00 pm
All time head to head:
Mizzou 11 Arkansas 4 >> .733
OU 66 Mizzou 22 (5 ties) >> .750 excluding ties
Sad to see OU is just ever so slightly more dominant over Mizzou than Mizzou is over Arkansas. This .017 shortfall gets fixed in 2024.
...
re: Mizzou is..
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 3/13/24 at 7:51 pm
Best 0-18 conference team ever....
re: UF and South Carolina, why don’t you want your rivals in SEC, again?
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 3/13/24 at 7:49 pm
[quote]If adding Clemson and FSU would mean more money for each of the teams in the SEC, the SEC will add teams.
If it's the same money or less they won't.[/quote]
Exactly right, the invisible hand of Adam Smith is finally at work.
We've had a century of inefficiency with desolate states li...
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/23/24 at 4:14 pm
[quote]There really is no reason for the SEC and Big Ten to leave the NCAA[/quote]
Money. Why give the other conference teams more than they deserve? An SEC B1G only championship would get great TV ratings.
I'd rather see the other conferences included, but only if they understand their valu...
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/23/24 at 12:46 pm
[quote]state legislature has already got involved[/quote]
I don't think the legislature is going to prevent UNC from making an extra 40 million per year if nc state can make about what it does now in big 12....
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/23/24 at 11:39 am
Seems more imminent to me. ESPN threatening FSU with felony charges. Option expiring in next couple years. Lots of unhappy campers being so far behind. Something big is breaking in next year....
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/23/24 at 8:35 am
[quote]Let's talk contraction
Missouri[/quote]
Removing Mizzou or replacing them with UVA would give the piggies a little better chance of getting bowl eligible most years. I see your point....
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/23/24 at 12:33 am
[quote]We can’t just be a football focused conference[/quote]
We could.
But even though those other sports don't matter much monetarily, I'm guessing the decision makers do assign some value to them. And I agree they should. It's just a matter of how much....
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/23/24 at 12:14 am
Although cable is clearly declining, the sec network still makes a nice chunk of change. And it can't charge more for a new team in a state already covered.
Also, streaming is moving back to cable bundle model. So we'll see what happens there.
Saying geography doesn't matter is false. It ma...
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/22/24 at 11:58 pm
Yep, that opens another can of worms though each being in a state already covered. That's why I wanted to ignore those 2. I think Fla St would be a money making add, not sure about Clemson.
And don't be naive. This is all about making more money for the existing sec teams....
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/22/24 at 11:47 pm
Fair enough, but VaTech still gets better ratings whether you stream, use cable, or whatever. And they have a bigger football fan base....
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/22/24 at 11:30 pm
Snooty UVA fans don't like being considered a tag along. I get it. But you need to face reality bud....
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/22/24 at 11:26 pm
[quote] What does Tech provide other than Michael Vick playing there a quarter century ago?
[/quote]
Bigger fan base, some part of DC Baltimore media market, better football tv ratings. Which all adds up to more media and attendance revenue for everyone. Although not a lot.
Not sure which i...
re: Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/22/24 at 10:59 pm
Yeah, but the ACC is dying right before our eyes right now. So I'm guessing the SEC will be expanding soon....
Let's talk expansion. UVA or Va Tech
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/22/24 at 10:46 pm
Assume the SEC wants UNC. Would it rather have UVA or VaTech as the tag along? Lets ignore Clemson and Fla St for now.
UVA is the flagship and has better academics. But VaTech has had better football, draws better attendance for its away conference games and gets better Tv ratings.
So I'm g...
re: $62 million donation to Mizzou football!
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 2/5/24 at 6:03 pm
[quote]sound like that Walmarts money movin West to CoMo from Fayettehog -
[/quote]
Geography major?
...
re: The SEC has the only logical geographical configuration.
Posted by RocketBallz2 on 1/1/24 at 9:57 am
I love the SEC's geographic fit but honestly it's not nearly as important as whether the candidate school raises the media payout for the other teams. There's really just 2 hurdles to clear to get into the P2:
1. Raise the per/team payouts.
2. Don't embarrass the other member institutions with ...
Popular