Started By
Message
re: Those celebrating Vols getting investigated might want to temper your happiness!
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:17 pm to SwampyWaters
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:17 pm to SwampyWaters
I'm not celebrating that it's Tennessee being targeted. But I do support the NCAA going after schools that allow NIL deals for their players that are in any way "pay to play".
The NCAA basically has ONE regulation for NIL. Schools have to monitor their players' NIL deals and if any are set up so that they are "used as an inducement for an individual to enroll or remain enrolled" at a school, the player must be suspended.
If the NCAA can show enough teeth to prevent pay to play, 95% of the problems with NIL go away and it might save college football from the NIL mess.
While it sucks for Tennessee fans that they're the example, if the NCAA is successful in setting the precedent so that other schools stop paying for players, it will be a huge win for college football as a whole.
The reality is we know that NIL deals for high school players aren't for endorsements. The player doesn't have fame yet to warrant such a payment before they even sign a LOI. At least with transfers you can argue the player might have enough fame to warrant a 6-figure payday endorsing products. But high school players, many of whom won't even start their first year? Unless they have a famous father or something their name/image/likeness isn't worth much yet.
So... sorry it's you getting smacked Tennessee. But I hope the smacking gets upheld by the courts so we can end pay to play.
The NCAA basically has ONE regulation for NIL. Schools have to monitor their players' NIL deals and if any are set up so that they are "used as an inducement for an individual to enroll or remain enrolled" at a school, the player must be suspended.
If the NCAA can show enough teeth to prevent pay to play, 95% of the problems with NIL go away and it might save college football from the NIL mess.
While it sucks for Tennessee fans that they're the example, if the NCAA is successful in setting the precedent so that other schools stop paying for players, it will be a huge win for college football as a whole.
The reality is we know that NIL deals for high school players aren't for endorsements. The player doesn't have fame yet to warrant such a payment before they even sign a LOI. At least with transfers you can argue the player might have enough fame to warrant a 6-figure payday endorsing products. But high school players, many of whom won't even start their first year? Unless they have a famous father or something their name/image/likeness isn't worth much yet.
So... sorry it's you getting smacked Tennessee. But I hope the smacking gets upheld by the courts so we can end pay to play.
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:19 pm to DawginSC
Agree 100%. Current situation is ridiculous
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:27 pm to DawginSC
quote:
But I do support the NCAA going after schools that allow NIL deals for their players that are in any way "pay to play".
In a perfect world, I would agree. However, NIL is pay to play no matter how you look at it. Name, Image and Likeness is a great idea, but it means nothing!
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 2/1/24 at 8:20 pm to DawginSC
quote:
sorry it's you getting smacked Tennessee.
I rather enjoy it. Their fans are dicks.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 8:46 am to DawginSC
You don’t think South Carolina is not pay for play for their players
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:08 am to DawginSC
quote:
But I do support the NCAA going after schools that allow NIL deals for their players that are in any way "pay to play".
The NCAA basically has ONE regulation for NIL. Schools have to monitor their players' NIL deals and if any are set up so that they are "used as an inducement for an individual to enroll or remain enrolled" at a school, the player must be suspended.
Ahh yes, so, at every other school, the recruit first signs, and then negotiates his NIL deal? Tennessee is the ONLY school that negotiates the figure before signing. Interesting. When's the last time you accepted a job without knowing the salary?
quote:
So... sorry it's you getting smacked Tennessee. But I hope the smacking gets upheld by the courts so we can end pay to play.
The NCAA routinely gets smacked around by the courts, so don't get your hopes up.
Years of fighting losing legal battles have left the NCAA almost helpless to defend itself
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:44 am to DawginSC
Imagine being dumb enough to believe that Georgia doesn’t do the same things other teams do lol. “They come to Georgia because they love Coach Smart and the University while turning down money from other schools.” That’s a level of stupid that rivals Alabama fans level of delusion
Posted on 2/2/24 at 6:46 pm to DawginSC
quote:
The NCAA basically has ONE regulation for NIL. Schools have to monitor their players' NIL deals and if any are set up so that they are "used as an inducement for an individual to enroll or remain enrolled" at a school, the player must be suspended.
So when Beck is ineligible because he was openly offered an NIL deal to return to UGA for 2024 you keep that same energy? Honest question.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)