Started By
Message

SportSource SoS updates
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:31 pm
SportSource SoS rankings.
Crazy how ESPN SoS rankings are so different from the one the Committee actually looks at.
#2 UTx
#6 USCe
#9 LSU
#12 tOSU
#13 UF
#18 Bama
#20 Mizzou
#21 OU
#23 Vandy
#25 MSU
#26 Michigan
#29 AU
#30 Washington
#37 Mississippi
#40 UTk
#48 Aggie
#49 UK
#51 Arky
#62 FSU
#63 UGA
#66 Oregon
*bold = CFP contention
Crazy how ESPN SoS rankings are so different from the one the Committee actually looks at.
#2 UTx
#6 USCe
#9 LSU
#12 tOSU
#13 UF
#18 Bama
#20 Mizzou
#21 OU
#23 Vandy
#25 MSU
#26 Michigan
#29 AU
#30 Washington
#37 Mississippi
#40 UTk
#48 Aggie
#49 UK
#51 Arky
#62 FSU
#63 UGA
#66 Oregon
*bold = CFP contention
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:37 pm to FootballFrenzy
It's Michigan State. I only put SEC teams and CFP contenders.
This post was edited on 12/1/23 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:39 pm to FootballFrenzy
Because they aren’t a SEC team or playoff contender is my guess, and that is who he listed.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:39 pm to FootballFrenzy
quote:
Why is there no #1?
There is a link.
In case you are curious.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:42 pm to Che Boludo
No way FSU schedule was more difficult than UGA. No way.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:50 pm to AirbusDawg
Maybe you shouldn’t have replaced OU with Ball State
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:51 pm to Che Boludo
quote:
#26 Michigan
I call bullshite.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:54 pm to Che Boludo
So LSU beat 5 teams that had a tougher SoS than uga.... cool.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 4:57 pm to SouthernInsanity
quote:
So LSU beat 5 teams that had a tougher SoS than uga.... cool
They were softened up for you.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 5:14 pm to Che Boludo
quote:
They were softened up for you.
What? That doesn’t even make sense
Posted on 12/1/23 at 5:30 pm to tigersbh
I think it's dumb that 3 CFP-contending teams are in the 60s. No shite, they're undefeated.
Great talent vs. shite schedules.
How a 1-loss Oregon is ahead of UTx and, arguably, even Bama is just dumb.
Great talent vs. shite schedules.
How a 1-loss Oregon is ahead of UTx and, arguably, even Bama is just dumb.
Posted on 12/1/23 at 5:38 pm to Che Boludo
quote:
I think it's dumb that 3 CFP-contending teams are in the 60s. No shite, they're undefeated.
Great talent vs. shite schedules.
How a 1-loss Oregon is ahead of UTx and, arguably, even Bama is just dumb.
Conspiracy!
Posted on 12/1/23 at 5:51 pm to TrueLefty
But wait.
Ole Miss beat LSU. WTF is going on here?
Ole Miss beat LSU. WTF is going on here?
Posted on 12/1/23 at 5:56 pm to JBlutarsky
Sos is a flawed system …
If UGA scheduled a team ranked in 100s as there warm up game they are already at a disadvantage .it would take 3 games of playing someone in the 30 range to even balance out playing someone that bad …let’s say UGA beats number one Bama but also plays number 100 Georgia state ….. UGA basically played two 50 tanks teams and gets hardly any credit for beating number one .. why you can’t use sos only .
If UGA scheduled a team ranked in 100s as there warm up game they are already at a disadvantage .it would take 3 games of playing someone in the 30 range to even balance out playing someone that bad …let’s say UGA beats number one Bama but also plays number 100 Georgia state ….. UGA basically played two 50 tanks teams and gets hardly any credit for beating number one .. why you can’t use sos only .
Posted on 12/1/23 at 6:08 pm to Che Boludo
quote:
#20 Mizzou
quote:
#37 Mississippi

Posted on 12/1/23 at 6:21 pm to Che Boludo
I have a difficult time understanding how Texas’ schedule could be ranked as harder than LSU’s schedule. LSU has played 3 road games against Top 11 CFP ranked teams (currently); and one “neutral site” game against the 4th ranked CFP team. Texas has nothing close to that. One game against a Top 10 CFP team. All I can figure is Grambling is so bad (Army too) it dragged the SOS way down. But beating a slightly better cupcake shouldn’t make that big a difference. So as the poster above said, SOS is really very flawed.
This post was edited on 12/1/23 at 6:24 pm
Back to top
