re: Locked On Auburn

quote:

---

I think the distinction here is it felt like while watching the game we were not doing enough so the argument here is intuitive.

---

Charlie’s whole argument is there isn’t an obvious way to stop Bowers. Otherwise other teams would’ve done it a long time ago.

quote:

---

Lol like this has any relevance to anything

---

It is highly relevant to me not doing what you tell me to do. Keep up.

quote:

---

“I’m not arguing” then goes on and argues. You don’t know the points being made by each.

---

I am actually not. I do know the points in the first 5 minutes or so because I listened to them and I only discussed what I heard. Crain laid out the argument. He flat out said he asked charlie to come on the radio to discuss the scheme.

quote:

---

If he doesn’t know shite about scheme, then obliterate his argument with your knowledge of scheme. Don’t sit here and make him prove his credentials on knowing scheme before then arguing his specific points.

---

I am not defending Jboy for how he handled the debate. It was a scheme discussion but charlie wanted no part of discusing scheming, however he called out Crains suggestions. The onus is on Charlie just as well for proving those suggestions would not work.

And you wrong as well.

quote:

---

Crain laid out the argument. He flat out said he asked charlie to come on the radio to discuss the scheme.

---

The argument was about stopping Bowers and what Auburn did/didn’t do and what they should have done. That’s where it all started.

quote:

---

It was a scheme discussion but charlie wanted no part of discusing scheming, however he called out Crains suggestions. The onus is on Charlie just as well for proving those suggestions would not work.

---

Charlie kept trying to talk about it and Crain wanted to talk about over fronts. Why is that relevant? Has nothing to do with what they’re talking about besides proving Charlie’s “worth” in the argument. Charlie didn’t go down that road because he doesn’t need to.

Crain probably could’ve obliterated him if he would’ve focused on the right things. But he was too emotional about some nobody implying he’s not smart.

quote:

---

chipping at safety.

---

Not to take sides but Kaufman is kind of a safety and the closest to line and the under coverage on the TD play and the 3rd down.

Both guys were kind of right. We don’t have the talent when Scott and Simpson are out. Plus Bowers had just been a simple TE prior to the 4th quarter. I’m sure in game prep we didn’t rep “chipping” the TE. So kind of hard to just yell out there hey Riley chip the tight end. So sure there are adjustments to be made in game but Bowers was just like any TE until the 4th quarter and no time to make an adjustment.

Great players force opposing players to make bad plays. The TD the threat of Bowers forced Puckett to drop to deep in his quarters coverage making the inside seem throw an easy pitch and catch. So no adjustments factor in not being in the correct spot. Even if he is in the correct spot Bowers might still make the catch

quote:

---

No dude go to the 9:15 mark. You dont do chipping at safety. Your dude is so hell bent saying we aint got the dudes for chipping. Like we need a 5* chipparooo

---

See my last post

Crain and Charlie agree Puckett would’ve been the one to chip on whatever play they’re talking about. And I think he’s saying Puckett can’t chip and then also keep up with Bowers

Crain literally makes the argument for chipping at the 9:15 mark. Not sure what you’re saying.

I’m saying we used the will linebacker to stack the box so UGA couldn’t run like they want to. You can’t keep a tight box looking out to a flex TE for when in zone coverage to try to stem or chip the TE. Especially with Riley he has enough trouble trying to do one job. Unless “chipping” the TE was in the game prep then you aren’t gonna get chipping in the game. We are in game 5 of the staff and no chipping isn’t a hard concept but I’m sure chipping a TE isn’t in our base package.

So both are right and wrong in the debate in my opinion. Maybe Charlie shouldn’t have responded to Jake on Twitter but Charlie didn’t act like a total arse on the locked on Auburn show. That’s my take and JBoy has never bothered me.

I just rewatched part of it.

At one point they said Wooden would’ve chipped him. Then another part they said Puckett.

So I don’t know who they think would’ve chipped.

Generally chipping is done with outside linebackers or defensive ends. Not defensive backs. Chipping is nothing more than a shoulder strike. Jamming is what defensive backs do. They take a kind of blocking style approach to try to stop or slow down the route of a WR. You wouldn’t expect a safety to ever chip or jam. That’s why they are a safety to cover the deep routes especially in zone. Kaufman the star in our defense is like a combo safety linebacker nickel corner. He’s to small to even attempt to chip Bowers

quote:

---

I said a speed bump isnt going to do anything for us if a safety is doing it. The safety is the last line of defense. What is point of a speed bump before Endzone 6. Chipping is as Corch says "shoulder striking" and then passing the player off.

---

I don’t know. Now it sounds like we’re agreeing so I’m confused.

Kind of tired of the argument anyways