Started By
Message

re: How to Destroy the ACC

Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:09 am to
Posted by bah7tea
Member since May 2015
97 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:09 am to
There's what you want, and then there's reality. The Big 10 is clearly not going to stay at 16 teams. The ACC is clearly going to die at some point like the PAC-12 is now.

The SEC needs to be proactive to get the most choice ACC teams or else the Big 10 will. If the Big 10 gets an exclusive foothold in Virginia and North Carolina it's Appomattox Part 2.
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
6887 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:16 am to
I hope the SEC adds VT if the ACC falls apart.

quote:

College Football games that registered on a seismograph:

Auburn at LSU (1988)
Miami at VT (2011)
Alabama at Auburn (2013)
OSU at VT (2015)
Miami at VT (2016)
Clemson at VT (2017)
Miami at VT (2018)
Notre Dame at VT (2018)
North Carolina at VT (2021)
Alabama at LSU (2022)


Their fans/stadium would be a blast to have in the conference.
This post was edited on 8/3/23 at 11:17 am
Posted by Grillades
Member since Nov 2009
553 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:23 am to
"The ACC is clearly going to die at some point like the PAC-12 is now."

The ACC schools are worried about staying competitive in 2-5 years. They still have time to work things out and execute a long-term plan. The PAC schools are facing unemployment in less than one year. The desperation level for each of those conferences is quite different. The PAC is either going to jump at whatever horrible TV deal they can get then add more crappy teams or they are going to completely disband. The ACC is nowhere near that state right now.

Who knows what tomorrow will bring, though?
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
4397 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:28 am to
quote:

The SEC needs to be proactive to get the most choice ACC teams or else the Big 10 will. If the Big 10 gets an exclusive foothold in Virginia and North Carolina it's Appomattox Part 2.


You misunderstand. I don't think the SEC really wants or needs any additional teams.

You seem to think that if the big 10 goes to 20 teams, the SEC has to follow suit. I don't. I think that would reduce the amount of money each SEC team could make and I think that's what drives their decision making.

Expansion when A&M and Mizzou came in was about markets. The last round was about blue bloods.

There aren't any blue bloods outside of the SEC/Big 10 aside from Notre Dame. Markets aren't driving TV deals now. There has to be a financial reason for the SEC to add anyone. Nobody has voiced any numbers showing why there is a reason right now.

There IS a reason for the Big 10, because they broadcast their games through the big 10 network that their conference owns. They get more games to broadcast by adding teams.

The SEC doesn't own their own network. ESPN broadcasts their games, and since they already own ACC games. They pay less per game for ACC games than they do for SEC games. They aren't going to pay more for that product if they don't have to. Adding those teams won't mean more money for the SEC as they're set up now.

While the SEC may want to mimic the Big 10 and own their own network, if they do that can't happen until 2034. The SEC doesn't want to hasten the ACC demise... they want to delay it, even if they want to expand and create a self owned SEC network.
Posted by MNW
Starkville, MS
Member since Mar 2015
1830 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

If the Big 10 gets an exclusive foothold in Virginia and North Carolina it's Appomattox Part 2.


I don't understand why everyone is so twisted up about getting UNC and UVA, its not 2012 anymore, we don't need to add new markets
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter