Started By
Message
re: Pollack ran his mouth to Saban at NC title game, gets fired 6 months later. Coincidence?
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:11 pm to DawgsLife
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:11 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
I can't help what another poster said and how he was wrong.
He had no contact with the team since the charges, wasn't even allowed to participate in Pro Day at Georgia's campus...but he was on the team.
quote:
That is probably why our second stringers and walk ons kicked your rear ends. Our players were ready and yours were not. That's a coaching problem.
Your players weren't ready when the starters were healthy. They got blown out.
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:12 pm to Knowshon5Dolla
quote:
But I'm sure you've got excuses for that, too.
Excuses, facts, whatever you want to call them.
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:14 pm to Alabama CrimsonTider
quote:Y’all are washed up, man.
We would’ve waxed TCU and had a good chance of beating UGA in LA
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:17 pm to mbogo
quote:
The margin of victory in the first game when the injuries were comparable vs the closeness of the second game when the injuries were disparate.
So this logic can be applied to every team that plays each other twice if there are injuries correct? Or can it only be applied to Georgia and Bama in a vacuum?
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:18 pm to mbogo
quote:
Excuses, facts, whatever you want to call them.
I'll go with excuses. Or whining. And the fact is-- it's pathetic.
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:20 pm to Knowshon5Dolla
Saban must be ashamed of the number of Alabama fans that make excuses.
This post was edited on 7/4/23 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:22 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
So, to get this straight....LSU should have been awarded the tile in 2011 since they won the first game? They already proved it in the first game and we all know what happens in the first game is always what happens in the second game.
You're not making sense. Bama lost the first LSU game on the last play despite having more yards/first downs, etc. while injuries weren't a significant factor. Bama won the first Georgia game decisively when injuries were comparable. Bama lost the second in the last minute despite having more yards with a number of starters missing. You can draw your own conclusions.
This post was edited on 7/4/23 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:23 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Saban must be ashamed of the amount of Alabama fans that make excuses.
Exactly. And yet they keep on coming.
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:24 pm to Alabama CrimsonTider
quote:
UGA easily cruised through the garbage east.
Saban would have won 3-4 in a row east if he had the privilege of playing in the sec east
UGA beat Bama’s arse, then they beat ours. UGA is the King of college football right now.
quote:Yeah, that was back when Bama ruled college football.
Saban has won back to back titles under harder conditions.
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:26 pm to mbogo
quote:
You can draw your own conclusions
We all conclude that you can't accept the fact that every now and then Alabama is going to straight up lose to a better team.
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:28 pm to FireDanMullen
quote:
So this logic can be applied to every team that plays each other twice if there are injuries correct? Or can it only be applied to Georgia and Bama in a vacuum?
These games were unique to themselves. There aren't going to be two other games with the exact same dynamics. If you have other games with different teams/dynamics then they can be discussed individually also.
Posted on 7/4/23 at 4:29 pm to Othello
quote:
And “if” Bama didn’t have Jalen Hurts in the 2018 SEC championship game they likely loose when Tua goes down.
Lol. It’s auto correct. When did this board become the grammar police. Did you really just comment on this thread just to edit my grammar and nothing else? I’m not even paying you to be my editing bitch, but thanks
Posted on 7/4/23 at 8:12 pm to mbogo
quote:
You're not making sense. Bama lost the first LSU game on the last play despite having more yards/first downs, etc. while injuries weren't a significant factor.
No. You are not making sense. the first game determines how the second game turns out. That's your reasoning, right? Williams would have done great things in the second game because he did in the first?
Come on, dude. You need to be consistent.
Let me see.
Texas would have won if Colt McCoy had not gotten hurt.
LSU gets the 2011 title because they won the first game in 2011, and that proves who the better team was.
At least attempt to be consistent. Or do the rules change only when Alabama is involved? Kind of like Alabama injuries and missing players affect the game but Georgia injuries and missing players do not matter?
quote:
You can draw your own conclusions.
I have drawn my own conclusions and did that based on your logic. Consistency means something.
Posted on 7/4/23 at 8:38 pm to Alabama CrimsonTider
Honestly, Pollack wasn't that good. There are worse but he was mostly below average. Likeable, not insightful.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 1:38 am to DawgsLife
quote:
No. You are not making sense. the first game determines how the second game turns out. That's your reasoning, right? Williams would have done great things in the second game because he did in the first?
No, my reasoning is that a team that won easily when both teams were basically even with injuries would have won the second game(that came down to the last minute) had the injury situation not be so skewed in Georgia's favor.
quote:
Texas would have won if Colt McCoy had not gotten hurt.
Certainly possible. Too bad we don't have a second game to give us a better idea.
quote:
LSU gets the 2011 title because they won the first game in 2011, and that proves who the better team was.
You are struggling trying to compare something that isn't comparable. Bama outplayed LSU both times, one was a close loss and the other was a dominating win. The Bama/Georgia games - a dominating Bama win and a last minute Georgia win with Bama down many starters out injured. Bama actually out gained Georgia in both games
quote:
At least attempt to be consistent.
The above is consistent. You're inconsistent with comparisons that are inapt.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 1:57 am to mbogo
quote:
You are struggling trying to compare something that isn't comparable. Bama outplayed LSU both times, one was a close loss and the other was a dominating win. The Bama/Georgia games - a dominating Bama win and a last minute Georgia win with Bama down many starters out injured. Bama actually out gained Georgia in both games
Im still struggling to grasp what your main point is.
Is it that the Bama team 2 years ago is superior to the Georgia team 2 years ago despite losing the championship?
Serious question. I legit don’t even understand what you’re defending.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 8:08 am to Alabama CrimsonTider
Another 10-2 season and no CFP will prove this point
Posted on 7/5/23 at 8:38 am to Alabama CrimsonTider
Then he wouldn't be coaching Alabama anymore, because they're in the West.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 9:24 am to mbogo
quote:
He had no contact with the team since the charges, wasn't even allowed to participate in Pro Day at Georgia's campus...but he was on the team.
Bama was super lucky he was not allowed to play anymore. He was our leading pass rusher, but we used our superior depth to overcome it.
Posted on 7/5/23 at 9:29 am to FireDanMullen
quote:
still struggling to grasp what your main point is.
This sums it up:
Every excuse counts for bama.
No excuse counts for any other team.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News