Started By
Message
re: Josh Pate: Jamaal Jarrett Story is an “embarrassment” to the AJC
Posted on 6/30/23 at 8:14 pm to crossroadsrj
Posted on 6/30/23 at 8:14 pm to crossroadsrj
quote:
Josh Pate.
I actually like Josh Pate and think he does a good job with the actual football parts of things but he's being 100 percent homer on this one. I couldn't sit through not one but 2 videos on this where he says there's bias, he read the stuff, and there's bias without him actually stating where the bias is or how the articles are wrong. It's a valiant effort at apologetics but he needs to actually support his arguments - saying I looked at it and it vaporized doesn't actually vaporize what they presented. Clearly laying out where those articles are wrong would do that but so far no one has done that.
If you're disputing allegations like this you make the case. Bitches be lying only works on people already prone to believe you and isn't a good argument.
3
Posted on 6/30/23 at 8:25 pm to Prof
quote:
there's bias without him actually stating where the bias is or how the articles are wrong.
What? As you said, you didn’t watch the videos.
Pate walks through the article starting with the gotcha headline without facts to even back that up. His “facts” are that the actual article doesn’t have facts to match the headline. Two instances. One two years ago that will go to trial and another that was a 16 year old boy recruit that was dropped (and properly so).
Writers issue is either with young black athletes or the legal system…zero facts in UGA match his click bait headlines.
Posted on 6/30/23 at 9:08 pm to Prof
quote:
t he's being 100 percent homer on this one.
After looking at the entire report, as Pate did, Judd clearly did not do an accurate and objective review of all of the evidence. He cherry picked what he wanted to spin it how he wanted. It doesnt make one a homer to reach that conclusion.
Posted on 6/30/23 at 9:27 pm to Prof
quote:
I actually like Josh Pate and think he does a good job with the actual football parts of things but he's being 100 percent homer on this one. I couldn't sit through not one but 2 videos on this where he says there's bias, he read the stuff, and there's bias without him actually stating where the bias is or how the articles are wrong. It's a valiant effort at apologetics but he needs to actually support his arguments - saying I looked at it and it vaporized doesn't actually vaporize what they presented. Clearly laying out where those articles are wrong would do that but so far no one has done that. If you're disputing allegations like this you make the case. Bitches be lying only works on people already prone to believe you and isn't a good argument.
Just read the police report, especially their text exchange. That will explain why it vaporizes.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News