Started By
Message
re: Little brother strikes again…
Posted on 5/29/23 at 12:09 pm to Diamondawg
Posted on 5/29/23 at 12:09 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Auburn earned it with or without his influence.
You act like AU hosting wasn’t debatable. That’s either ignorant or purposefully dishonest. They and SC were clearly the most questionable depending on what metrics you looked at.
But there was literally not a single projection of any repute where AU was higher than Bama that I saw. That’s not debatable at all. That’s just AU pettiness and little brother syndrome.
This post was edited on 5/29/23 at 12:16 pm
3
Posted on 5/29/23 at 12:18 pm to BamaBravesPackers
quote:They have been in every mock for week(s).
You act like AU hosting wasn’t debatable.
Posted on 5/29/23 at 12:19 pm to BamaBravesPackers
They obviously punished teams that played 150 rpi+ teams. Cohen mentioned that like 7 times. Half of Bama's wins were against quad 4 teams which was the most of all regional hosts. Auburn and UK played the least amount of those games. I had Bama #12 and AU #14 for what it is worth. Auburn got screwed a few years back when we were expected to be a solid host and ended up as a two seed then matched with #1 UF in supers. It happens
Posted on 5/29/23 at 3:39 pm to BamaBravesPackers
quote:
You act like AU hosting wasn’t debatable. That’s either ignorant or purposefully dishonest. They and SC were clearly the most questionable depending on what metrics you looked at. But there was literally not a single projection of any repute where AU was higher than Bama that I saw. That’s not debatable at all. That’s just AU pettiness and little brother syndrome.
LINK /
Should have looked harder
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News