Started By
Message

re: OU received invite in 2010 but did not think A&M was a good partner

Posted on 5/9/23 at 7:10 pm to
Posted by Matts El Rancho
Member since May 2023
1053 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

The SEC won 9 titles from 2010 until now. What’s your point here?
I think the point was the SEC wasn't viewed as dominant and as much of a "mecha" of college football from 1996-2010 as it is from 2010-present

Also, that aggie was talking about Texas falling back to "normal state of irrelevance" which is comical considering Texas had (i) just finished as the winningest power conference football program the prior decade and (ii) just played for a national title in football, baseball and volleyball the prior year, something a&m has never accomplished in the last 84 years and likely will never accomplish
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 7:13 pm
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37668 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

just played for a national title in football


Who’d sip play and how’d that go?
Posted by Che Boludo
Member since May 2009
18298 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

SEC wasn't viewed as dominant and as much of a "mecha" of college football from 1996-2010

The SEC won 8 of 15 NC titles in that period with several other top contenders and an undefeated AU team that was left out. They had 5 in a row among four different teams from 2006-2010.
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 7:24 pm
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30759 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

I think the point was the SEC wasn't viewed as dominant and as much of a "mecha" of college football from 1996-2010 as it is from 2010-present


You must be trying to be funny.

This is really poor awareness.
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 8:07 pm
Posted by Windy City
Member since Jun 2019
1754 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Also, that aggie was talking about Texas falling back to "normal state of irrelevance" which is comical considering Texas had (i) just finished as the winningest power conference football program the prior decade and (ii) just played for a national title in football, baseball and volleyball the prior year, something a&m has never accomplished in the last 84 years and likely will never accomplish


Here comes the Longhorn statisticians torturing data to try and buck up their resume.

Fact . . .Going into the Mack Brown era, Texas had been pretty irrelevant in football Brown since Fred Akers first few years.

Fact . . . .Oklahoma was actually the winningest program during the 2000-2010 stretch you reference, not Texas.

Fact . .. . . Texas could muster just 2 conference titles in a crappy Big 12 during this supposed unbelievable run. Oklahoma had 7 in the same stretch.

Fact- You dumb motherfu#$ers ran off Mack Brown, hired Charlie Strong, and were back to losing seasons, missing bowl games, and geneeally being irrelevant just like you were prior to Mack's brief stint in Austin.


So the original remains. Oklahoma should have cut ties with Texas and been its own advocate as it has always been a better football product.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter