Started By
Message

2022 College Football Projections - Alabama game by game projections

Posted on 8/23/22 at 5:50 pm
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/23/22 at 5:50 pm
Some tweaks to the way the transfer portal is incorporated into returning production. TL/DR the SEC West is stacked. Water is wet.

Let's football!














This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 4:38 pm
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20596 posts
Posted on 8/23/22 at 8:38 pm to
Appreciate you putting this together.

What made you go with the 70% previous year FEI weighting? I know you adjust using returning production, gut reaction just says that’s pretty high.

Curious if you have run a retrospective analysis on your formula to see how predictive it is using data from previous years?
This post was edited on 8/23/22 at 8:43 pm
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 11:04 am to
#1 ALABAMA : 12-0 (8-0) (#2 off, #3 def)

Alabama 51 - Utah State 9

Alabama 38 - Texas 21

Alabama 56 - ULM 7

Alabama 52 - Vanderbilt 7

Alabama 39 - Arkansas 21

Alabama 37 - Texas A&M 14

Alabama 41 - Tennessee 24

Alabama 41 - Mississippi State 17

Alabama 35 - LSU 21

Alabama 38 - Ole Miss 17

Alabama 100 - Austin Peay 2

Alabama 41 - Auburn 14
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 12:05 pm
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
83226 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 11:06 am to
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Appreciate you putting this together.

What made you go with the 70% previous year FEI weighting? I know you adjust using returning production, gut reaction just says that’s pretty high.

Curious if you have run a retrospective analysis on your formula to see how predictive it is using data from previous years?



It's tough to go much lower before you start just seeing teams that recruit well and return guys popping up in the Top 7-10. 70%, when applied, felt about right as a baseline to sort of set where programs are right now. Then, returning players/recruiting/transfers kind of propels or drops them from where they were. FSU and State are pretty good examples of that - both were between 30-40 last year but they return everyone and have decent recruiting, so that popped them into the Top 10-20.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 11:15 am to
#22 AUBURN: 7-5 (3-5) (#37 off, #16 def)

- Auburn 3 - Mercer 2

- Auburn 34 - San Jose State 10

- Auburn 24 - Penn State 21

- Auburn 35 - Missouri 17

- Auburn 24 - LSU 22

- Georgia 37 - Auburn 13

- Ole Miss 29 - Auburn 23

- Auburn 28 - Arkansas 24

- Mississippi Stat 28 - Auburn 21

- Texas A&M 22 - Auburn 21

- Auburn 35 - Western Kentucky 17

- Alabama 41 - Auburn 14
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 12:04 pm
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 11:30 am to
#18 LSU (7-5, 3-5) (#33 off, #13 def)

- LSU 27 - FSU 21

- LSU 19 - Southern 6

- LSU 26 - Mississippi State 23

- LSU 37 - New Mexico 3

- Auburn 24 - LSU 22

- LSU 30 - Tennessee 27

- Florida 24 - LSU 23

- LSU 28 - Ole Miss 24

- Alabama 35 - LSU 21

- Arkansas 27 - LSU 24

- LSU 34 - UAB 20

- Texas A&M 24 - LSU 17
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 12:16 pm
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 11:30 am to
#26 ARKANSAS 7-5 (4-4) (#23 off, #34 def)

- Arkansas 27 - Cincinnati 23

- Arkansas 30 - South Carolina 17

- Arkansas 500 - Missouri State 0

- Texas A&M 27 - Arkansas 21

- Alabama 39 - Arkansas 21

- Mississippi State 31 - Arkansas 23

- BYU 33 - Arkansas 27

- Auburn 28 - Arkansas 24

- Arkansas 35 - Liberty 17

- Arkansas 27 - LSU 24

- Arkansas 28 - Ole Miss 27

- Arkansas 31 - Missouri 24
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Bham Bammer
Member since Nov 2014
16420 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 11:46 am to
quote:

#12 Auburn



But seriously, thanks for the information, SOG.
Posted by TomRollTideRitter
Member since Aug 2016
13173 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 12:07 pm to
More like Summer of Georgia
Posted by RollTide33
Member since Sep 2019
4300 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 12:29 pm to
17% returning production gets you the #1 defense? That seems off somehow.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/24/22 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

17% returning production gets you the #1 defense? That seems off somehow.


It's 17th percentile. And it does when combined with past performance and recruiting, though much closer to others than last year.

All in all defenses across the top of college football won't be as good and offenses will be better, at least according to this.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
51542 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 10:32 am to
Auburn at 12 and LSU with their turnover at 8 is surprising. But obviously their rosters have talent.

Thanks for the information as always SoG
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 10:44 am to
It seems high, but then you run their schedules and that ranking = 8-4 with a bunch of close games where if they go the wrong way could be 6-6.

Such is life in the SEC West.
Posted by hnds2th
Member since May 2019
3096 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 3:11 pm to
Thanks SOG, hope it’s accurate.
Posted by TizzyT4theUofA
This side of eternity
Member since Jun 2016
12310 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 6:10 pm to
What does the SEC championship against UK look like?

Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
83226 posts
Posted on 8/25/22 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

What does the SEC championship against UK look like?




Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 11:18 am to
Rankings are updated (final tweak before season). Transfer portal was the biggest change - it was underrepresented bigly before, now it factors more into returning production.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
25046 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 11:45 am to
so was Auburn #12 in one of your previous models?
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
105718 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 11:47 am to
quote:

so was Auburn #12 in one of your previous models?


Which was one of the triggers for adjustments. A big piece was the transfer part only accounted for transfers in, not out, and it wasn't heavily enough factored into returning production. So it really gave a bonus to schools that brought a bunch of guys in (many of which lost a bunch of guys that they weren't penalized for).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter