Started By
Message

Gotta give CU credit- they were not intimidated. Violence rivaled Bama v LSU
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:32 am
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:32 am
which was 100% big-boy football.
D Watson and that big WR knew they were marked men from the beginning. They got hammered early and often. And they kept pushing and made the plays that ultimately won them the MNC.
That game should put "Clemsoning" to rest. They go about things differently than Bama; but they are SEC big, tough, and fast.
D Watson and that big WR knew they were marked men from the beginning. They got hammered early and often. And they kept pushing and made the plays that ultimately won them the MNC.
That game should put "Clemsoning" to rest. They go about things differently than Bama; but they are SEC big, tough, and fast.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:34 am to WorkinDawg
Agree, great teams. The SEC should now know how to catch up with the ACC, but it starts on the lines and QBs
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:36 am to WorkinDawg
quote:
but they are SEC big, tough, and fast.
Is this still a thing? The SEC has been soft the last couple years.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:40 am to bawbarn
I disagree. Alabama was doing all of the hard-hitting with vicious defense. Clemson couldn't tackle Bo Scarbrough . LSU was way more physically imposing.
People, this game, and Clemson the last 2 seasons, came down to one player - Deshaun Watson.
Trade QBs, and Bama blows them out of the fricking stratosphere. Alabama was better at every position except QB
People, this game, and Clemson the last 2 seasons, came down to one player - Deshaun Watson.
Trade QBs, and Bama blows them out of the fricking stratosphere. Alabama was better at every position except QB
This post was edited on 1/10/17 at 11:42 am
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:41 am to uofarolltide
I mean the SEC as a whole. The conference isn't as big and scary as many want to think it is.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:43 am to uofarolltide
Meh, their receivers kicked arse. Deshaun's passing wasn't perfect but they made the play every time
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:43 am to bawbarn
quote:
I mean the SEC as a whole. The conference isn't as big and scary as many want to think it is.
Yeah it is. We just have terrible QBs in the conference right now. We're dominant on defense and every other position group
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:44 am to WorkinDawg
Yea but those pick plays though
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:47 am to Mr. Hangover
It is a softer conference compared to others, but will be back on top in a few years
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:48 am to uofarolltide
quote:
I disagree. Alabama was doing all of the hard-hitting with vicious defense. Clemson couldn't tackle Bo Scarbrough . LSU was way more physically imposing.
People, this game, and Clemson the last 2 seasons, came down to one player - Deshaun Watson.
Trade QBs, and Bama blows them out of the fricking stratosphere. Alabama was better at every position except QB
My comment was about Clemson handling the physicality of the game, not that it rivaled the LSU game. Clemson handled Bama's strength better than Bama handled Clemon's...imo at least.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:48 am to WorkinDawg
the difference in this game was QB play
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:56 am to Brosef Stalin17
As the game went on, it became apparent that Clemson was deeper and better conditioned than Bama.
I can't remember the last time a Saban team won the turnover battle by 2 and still got outmanned when it came down to crunch time. That game was Dabo's Mona Lisa and an exclamation point on establishing Clemson as an elite program.
I can't remember the last time a Saban team won the turnover battle by 2 and still got outmanned when it came down to crunch time. That game was Dabo's Mona Lisa and an exclamation point on establishing Clemson as an elite program.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:07 pm to silverstreak02
quote:
As the game went on, it became apparent that Clemson was deeper and better conditioned than Bama.
Can't say I agree on the conditioning part, but Bama certainly had a depth problem. Not having Eddie Jackson and Shaun Dion-Hamilton really came home to roost late in the game when the guys that would have been subbing for them had instead been on the field a very, very long time.
In the end, that's just football. Last year, IIRC, Clemson was down a few players and Bama won the game. Tables were turned this season.
As I said in another thread, these teams have played for the title two years in a row with a combined scoring differential of one point. That's about as even as you can get so every little thing matters a whole lot.
Anyhow, congrats on the win. It was a fantastic game.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:13 pm to uofarolltide
quote:
Trade QBs, and Bama blows them out of the fricking stratosphere. Alabama was better at every position except QB
That could be said about a lot of teams. Put Watson at LSU. LSU would of beat Bama by 35 points.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:16 pm to silverstreak02
quote:
As the game went on, it became apparent that Clemson was deeper and better conditioned than Bama.
I can't remember the last time a Saban team won the turnover battle by 2 and still got outmanned when it came down to crunch time. That game was Dabo's Mona Lisa and an exclamation point on establishing Clemson as an elite program.
Yeah, yall are such a deep and elite program that I'm sure losing DWatson will be a minor bump in the road on your back to the playoffs in 2017 (lol)
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:17 pm to AshLSU
quote:
That could be said about a lot of teams. Put Watson at LSU. LSU would of beat Bama by 35 points.
That was my point. With Watson at Clemson, they only won by 4.
Clemson was largely a one man team
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:20 pm to uofarolltide
quote:
Yeah, yall are such a deep and elite program that I'm sure losing DWatson will be a minor bump in the road on your back to the playoffs in 2017 (lol)
They've won 10 games or more for 6 straight seasons.
It's ok to admit they're a pretty damned good program.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:21 pm to Brosef Stalin17
quote:
the difference in this game was QB play
Same as the Bama-LSU game.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:29 pm to WorkinDawg
Bama's defense is just nasty. It's incredible to me the size and talent of their front 7 EVERY DAMN YEAR. If you don't have an elite Oline you better have a Johnny Manziel or a Deshaun Watson back there that can pull off athletic heroics.
I think this has largely been the difference in the LSU/Bama matchups over the past 6 years. LSU's oline talent has dropped off and we just don't have those players at QB. Talent is very comparable at most other positions but LSU always seems to be stuck in a pit because we can't control the line of scrimmage like with other teams and our QB play has been shite. Makes the gameplanning by Bama easy as pie against us. Win field position. Take lead. Pound them into submission with the running game. Don't gift them points off turnovers.
I think this has largely been the difference in the LSU/Bama matchups over the past 6 years. LSU's oline talent has dropped off and we just don't have those players at QB. Talent is very comparable at most other positions but LSU always seems to be stuck in a pit because we can't control the line of scrimmage like with other teams and our QB play has been shite. Makes the gameplanning by Bama easy as pie against us. Win field position. Take lead. Pound them into submission with the running game. Don't gift them points off turnovers.
This post was edited on 1/10/17 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 1/10/17 at 12:32 pm to WorkinDawg
They almost clemsoned it to us though. Oj Howard's bust play? Couldn't believe that happened again.
Popular
Back to top
