Started By
Message

Do you think they should re-seed for the NCAA tournament after each weekend?
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:41 pm
Doesn't necessarily kill the Cinderella idea, but it also ensures that if you're a #1 seed that you get the easiest path, period. I don't necessarily like watching the 11 seeds vs. 13 seeds.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:42 pm to ForeverGator
What a stupid fricking thread.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:43 pm to ForeverGator
Its an interesting idea. At least reseeding within regions makes sense. But there is something awesome about those few double digit seed vs. double digit seed matchups we get every once in a while.
This post was edited on 3/23/15 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:46 pm to ForeverGator
It's a tournament that starts off with seeds and has been successful the way it is. That would be a horrible idea.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:46 pm to ForeverGator
I can't even imagine the logistics nightmare that would create when it comes to regions and locations.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:48 pm to ForeverGator
No. The seedings are based on ~34-game bodies of work. Don't change them because of one/two games.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:48 pm to BluegrassBelle
I assume it would have to be within the same regions. Because yeah, it wouldn't work otherwise.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:49 pm to ForeverGator
Boy, McElweenie already fricked up Florida fan's reasoning ability. Shame, back in the day I liked UF
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:49 pm to ForeverGator
No that is completely retarded.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 4:51 pm to ForeverGator
Holy shite, frick you. Stahp.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 5:29 pm to ForeverGator
quote:Yes. Would make the tournament more legit.
Do you think they should re-seed for the NCAA tournament after each weekend?
Posted on 3/23/15 at 5:29 pm to ForeverGator
May be the worse idea I've ever heard. Honestly.
Posted on 3/23/15 at 6:33 pm to GatorReb
That's a big negative ghost rider
Posted on 3/23/15 at 6:35 pm to ForeverGator
Yes. Let's try to stack the deck even MORE toward the bluebloods.
Popular
Back to top
