Started By
Message
re: Just for fun....
Posted on 12/4/19 at 8:51 pm to LanierSpots
Posted on 12/4/19 at 8:51 pm to LanierSpots
A Bama fan at work saw that and told me about it. Had me worried for just a bit until I checked my usual sources and found nothing mentioning it.
FYI: worried not because I hate Gus, but because this season simply doesn't warrant a 5 year extension, but I don't trust AU admin not to make a bone headed move like that.
FYI: worried not because I hate Gus, but because this season simply doesn't warrant a 5 year extension, but I don't trust AU admin not to make a bone headed move like that.
1
Posted on 12/4/19 at 9:23 pm to SemperAuburn
The problem with Gus is and will be the buyout not his salary.
With that win Gus probably bought himself 2 more years. We should try to front load his guarantees/buyout inside a contract raise/extension
As in, raise him to say $8m and guarantee it 2020/2021. Then say 50% guarantee 2022, 2023,2024
Functionally, his guarantees go up while his buyout drops by $5m after 2021
With that win Gus probably bought himself 2 more years. We should try to front load his guarantees/buyout inside a contract raise/extension
As in, raise him to say $8m and guarantee it 2020/2021. Then say 50% guarantee 2022, 2023,2024
Functionally, his guarantees go up while his buyout drops by $5m after 2021
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 9:35 pm
Posted on 12/4/19 at 9:25 pm to GenesChin
Yeah he would be an idiot to do that
Posted on 12/4/19 at 9:39 pm to blzr
quote:
Yeah he would be an idiot to do that
Not so sure, this type of contract would settle a lot of things for him for the cost of only $2mil total
- Cliff buyout would remove him from hot seat discussion + negative recruiting
- Guaranteed $ goes up
- Clear raise $1m
The drop in buyout after 2021 season is only about $4mil but he'd be getting back $2mil in 19/20 seasons
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 12/4/19 at 9:39 pm to GenesChin
quote:
We should try to front load his guarantees/buyout inside a contract raise/extension
How is that any different than paying his buyout at the end.
In fact, it’s actually worse for us if you factor in the time value of money
Posted on 12/4/19 at 9:48 pm to Weagle25
quote:
How is that any different than paying his buyout at the end.
In fact, it’s actually worse for us if you factor in the time value of money
Auburn buyouts are largely a strain to cash flow and not to value largely due to how ADs run their finances
So yes it would cost more $ but by easing the CF strain it gives more flexibility to made long term value adding decisions
This post was edited on 12/4/19 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 12/4/19 at 10:11 pm to GenesChin
Do you just post and make all this up?
Posted on 12/5/19 at 5:12 am to BranTheHuman2
quote:
You're such a bastard
I told you guys before. Im just here for the party.
Posted on 12/5/19 at 7:11 am to GenesChin
quote:
Auburn buyouts are largely a strain to cash flow and not to value largely due to how ADs run their finances
So yes it would cost more $ but by easing the CF strain it gives more flexibility to made long term value adding decisions
How does it ease cash flow if the cash is already gone...that makes zero sense
The cash mostly comes from the boosters anyways
Posted on 12/5/19 at 7:16 am to GenesChin
quote:
Cliff buyout would remove him from hot seat discussion + negative recruiting
You’re losing it man.
No buyout only increases his hot seat as a high buyout would be a reason to not fire him.
Negative recruiting would be worse because they would say AD has no faith in him which is why they keep the buyout low.
quote:
Guaranteed $ goes up
Not when his entire contract is guaranteed which I believe it is.
Page 2 of 2
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News