Started By
Message

re: Former Freeze Assistant Discusses AU

Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:41 pm to
Posted by The_SwAUggford
Member since Jan 2013
4027 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

The D would work a lot better without those 3 man fronts laid out on a silver platter in 3rd and long.
I want to know why we're doing this. I want to hear the logic. Maybe it's as simple as you dont want to be predictable. We were blitzing early and often in the first half. Maybe it's as simple as you're blitzing on 2nd down late in the game and the guys aren't as fresh as they were early? I don't know. Maybe there's smart reasons most football coaches would agree with. Dj is widely lauded as a great coach so I want to hear him speak on it.
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
13324 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

quote:

: The D would work a lot better without those 3 man fronts laid out on a silver platter in 3rd and long.
I want to know why we're doing this
Incompetence pays so well at AU that they don't have to wake up for work for years.
Posted by The_SwAUggford
Member since Jan 2013
4027 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:54 pm to
Ignorant take
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
13324 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:56 pm to
Just working with what's given.
Posted by The_SwAUggford
Member since Jan 2013
4027 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:58 pm to
No you're not. You're ignoring djs track record.
Posted by AUTubaHerd
Member since Nov 2012
2868 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I hope so. I am ready for a 1000 yard receiver. Please be KLS.


Would be a pretty funny middle finger to Penn State and James Franklin
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25161 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

Basically he said he just does not understand why Thorne or Hank cannot "get it." He said he coached with Freeze for years and never saw a QB as confused as those guys.


I wonder if the new radio communication helmets can create more confusion than is helpful.

Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14308 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

I want to know why we're doing this. I want to hear the logic
It's being done because conventional football wisdom dictates that you drop more into coverage on 3rd and long. Unfortunately, we either don't have the talent or the experience to execute that defensive scheme. Now that the coaches have worn out the "I think things will improve" and will be forced to go to unconventional defense on 3rd and long situations. Surely they have come the realization that we cannot reliably get pressure with only a 3 man front and will have to gamble and bring someone as a blitzer. I can only hope.
Posted by The_SwAUggford
Member since Jan 2013
4027 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Surely they have come the realization that we cannot reliably get pressure with only a 3 man front
We actually got green out the pocket on a 3 man rush a few times. I remember specifically it was keyron on one.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39726 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:56 pm to
Yea the 3 man fronts that don’t make sense are when we are using them on 1st and 2nd down. We did that far less against Arky. Problem is our pass coverage is way too relaxed. Guys focus way too much on covering an area and not adapting when guys run into their zone.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19261 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 7:57 pm to
Here's Siskey on another podcast talking about AU. Interesting interview.

Posted by The_SwAUggford
Member since Jan 2013
4027 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:03 pm to
Id buy that logic. I wonder if we see the gameplan change for OU. Penalties and green's legs killed us more than anything on 3rd and longs.
Posted by AuburnTigers
9x National Champion
Member since Aug 2013
17432 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:03 pm to
We lost two games, both close and in both we had 5 turnovers
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39726 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:25 pm to
Yep. That 3rd and 19 bomb was a three man rush that collapsed the pocket and got him out on the edge pretty quickly. Problem was the backend just lost everyone. Our safeties are way too concerned with the running QB’s, when that is what the Lb’s should be concerned with. Happened against Cal and NM too. Every time the QB got outside the pocket, the backend just all started staring at him and reacting to him, even though there were layers of defenders in front of them.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14308 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

We actually got green out the pocket on a 3 man rush a few times. I remember specifically it was keyron on one.
The key word to my post was "reliably". We lost the IB last year due to a 3 man rush on 4th and SUPER long. How many times do we need to see a 3rd and long converted this season, to finally get the point that we Nick Fairly isn't on this team?

The point is, if you can't pressure rushing 3, and the QB has all day to find an open receiver, he will most likely end up finding an open receiver.
Posted by Beachbum87
Niceville, FL
Member since Oct 2022
4215 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

We lost the IB last year due to a 3 man rush on 4th and SUPER long.


2 man rush
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14308 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

2 man rush
I guess my mind tried to compensate for that nightmare.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39726 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 9:03 pm to
Your overall point is still valid. We do it too much for our pass rush ability. I’ve seen Every major team this year call similar plays in similar situations, so it is fine to do. I think we just do it too much and telegraph it too much.
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 9:04 pm
Posted by The_SwAUggford
Member since Jan 2013
4027 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 9:08 pm to
Keionte mf Scott being asked to play every position in the secondary played into it too. Silver lining: if we've identified the issue I'm sure dj has too. Harsh reality: will the coaching translate to the game? I doubt dj is just now noticing the issue ya know
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14308 posts
Posted on 9/25/24 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Your overall point is still valid. We do it too much for our pass rush ability. I’ve seen Every major team this year call similar plays in similar situations, so it is fine to do. I think we just do it too much and telegraph it too much.
It's extremely conventional wisdom, regardless if it's HS, college, NFL, or Madden on Playstation. You get an opponent in a 3rd and long, you drop a lot of people back and rush few. Make them, make the play with the odds in your favor. Unfortunately, we don't have the horses on the line OR in the d-backfield, so you HAVE to bring more pass rushers against an empty backfield and hope your defenders can either beat 5 blockers or the pass defenders force a safety valve throw that ends up short of the 1st down marker. Not optimal, but you have to work with what you've got. Otherwise, you end up seeing what we've been seeing.......
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter