Started By
Message

Stoners and others unite...

Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:46 pm
Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37295 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:46 pm
Issue 7 is off the ballot.

So 6 it is for medical mary j.

Vote.

Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:58 pm to
Sadly, I have a bad feeling about this
Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37295 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 1:13 pm to
that it's not going to pass? or that it's a bad idea in general?
Posted by Razorback Reverend
Member since Dec 2013
22732 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 1:37 pm to
Yes
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

that it's not going to pass? or that it's a bad idea in general?




I don't think its a bad idea although the other issue was probably better. I just don't trust this state over issues like this.
Posted by HogFanfromHTown
Dallas, TX
Member since Sep 2015
3597 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:49 pm to
Legalize it, don't criticize it. I'd rather have a bunch of Arkansans smoke weed than continue the slow death of opiate dependency.
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 2:49 pm
Posted by hogfly
Fayetteville, AR
Member since May 2014
4634 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:51 pm to
The insanity is that 7 was the better initiative so early voters voted for it. They aren't allowed to recast their ballots. Since 7 got thrown off, early voters basically voted against MM in the state.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

The insanity is that 7 was the better initiative so early voters voted for it. They aren't allowed to recast their ballots. Since 7 got thrown off, early voters basically voted against MM in the state.


Ya, that was why my mindset was voting for both even though I clearly like one more than the other. It is stupid that it took this long to review the issue and overturn it because of signatures. That shite should have been handled much earlier than this.
Posted by russellvillehog
Member since Apr 2016
9711 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 3:45 pm to
I really wish 7 would have won. I voted for both today
Posted by russellvillehog
Member since Apr 2016
9711 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 3:48 pm to
My brother voted no to 6 and yes to 7. After he heard it got dropped he said "I've been smoking weed illegally for years, all I will not vote for something that I don't agree with. The no grow and the controlling nature of the bill is not agreeable"

I don't smoke, but I think it should be legal.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 3:50 pm to
quote:



I don't smoke, but I think it should be legal.


I can understand why people don't agree with certain parts of the issue but I don't really understand who can be against it medically.
Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37295 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

I think it should be legal.


me too, give me someone high over seriously drunk any day of the week.

eta: high on pot not bath salts or something else that makes people go nuts...
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 4:49 pm
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 8:01 pm to
seems awfully late in the game to remove an issue.

what a bunch we've got in Little Rock.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65767 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 8:02 pm to
As long as Cali legalizes, which it will, all that matters.

Nevada will probably pass too but Cali is the big fish that will get shite poppin'.
Posted by WonderWartHawg
Member since Dec 2010
10397 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

seems awfully late in the game to remove an issue.

what a bunch we've got in Little Rock.


It's VERY late. It makes you think they might be.... up to something.

This is very fishy and smells of collusion.
Posted by Columbia
Land of the Yuppies
Member since Mar 2016
3132 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

I can understand why people don't agree with certain parts of the issue but I don't really understand who can be against it medically.


Basically because if you don't know the facts, it just sounds like pot heads trying to get legal weed. I've dispensed THC pills to pediatric kids with cancer so they will eat on top of chemo. I've also seen THC oil relieve kids of seizure disorders.

There's a place for it in the public sector and medical, but some folks are too narrow minded to fathom such an idea.
Posted by blacknblu
Member since Nov 2011
10276 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:54 pm to
Now, I've read to still vote for both in case they can get the latest ruling overturned. It couldn't hurt
Posted by johnzorback
Member since Apr 2012
4122 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 12:20 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/2/21 at 1:42 pm
Posted by Hogssmellgood
Hog in Vol land
Member since Nov 2012
2107 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 6:49 am to
I've never smoked weed, I may not ever do it (can't ever rule anything out), but I can't imagine voting against legalization. There are so many people it could save from opoid addiction, not to mention that full legalization could save the state so much money by not having a shite ton of non-violent drug offenders in prison
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
16950 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 7:47 am to
The whole weed thing just blows my mind. So you're telling me the government says it's against the law to plant a seed?

Why not make rose bushes illegal while you're at it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter