Started By
Message

re: Off Topic: Governor's race. Walt Maddox vs. Kay Ivey

Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:15 am to
Posted by lion
Member since Aug 2016
816 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:15 am to
The fact that people are so attached to Trump or that they are so against Trump that they cant seperate him from a governors race is fascinating to me. In not an engineer, but I dont think we need to build a wall in Gulf Shores.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:18 am to
quote:

And that says more about the voters in Alabama than it does Ivey.


Would have been a valid tactic in any election you have wrapped up. Why involve yourself in something that could only possibly hurt your chances? That makes no sense.

I don't like that she isn't debating, but that isn't going to get me to vote for a Democrat. I voted against her in the primary, but she's not ideologically different enough from me to make me support anyone who identifies with the current Democrat platform.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:21 am to
quote:

I don't know about Georgia, but Alabama isn't going Democrat anytime soon, regardless of what happens in the Governor's race. OUr system is still set up to favor the rural areas, and those areas are very, very conservative. The state legislature is going to be conservative for the foreseeable future, and the power in Alabama lies more with the state legislature than it does the governor's office, also by design.


It's amazing to me the level of ignorance people display when discussing Alabama politics. Our state legislature was Democrat from the 1860s until 2010. There's no way anyone can make statements like the one quoted above if they know anything about the history of Alabama state government.
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
46013 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:23 am to
Abrams isn't going to turn Georgia into Vermont. She will spend the next 4 years basically negating all the crazy, fricked up shite the South Georgia rednecks who dominate the legislature want to do. The GOP really needed Cagle to win the primary. Deal 2.0 would have been palatable to moderates and even some liberals, but Kemp is nuttier than a squirrel turd, so it's going to be a close one.
This post was edited on 8/29/18 at 8:24 am
Posted by lion
Member since Aug 2016
816 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Would have been a valid tactic in any election you have wrapped up. Why involve yourself in something that could only possibly hurt your chances? That makes no sense.
People understand why she wont do it and thats what makes them mad, and Im not talking about just democrats - its not a party issue. She works for the people.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:32 am to
It bothered me in the Republican primary, because I knew the other candidates would be a better choice. I don't believe that in the general election. I don't think the other candidates in the general election would be a better choice or represent my interests in our state government.
Posted by McGregor
Member since Feb 2011
6670 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:42 am to
quote:

I don't think the other candidates in the general election would be a better choice or represent my interests in our state government.


the one who can complete a sentence with logical thoughts?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:44 am to
quote:

the one who can complete a sentence with logical thoughts?


Was this supposed to be a legitimate complaint about Kay Ivey? Just so you know, no one actually believes this.
Posted by lion
Member since Aug 2016
816 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Was this supposed to be a legitimate complaint about Kay Ivey? Just so you know, no one actually believes this.

After she wins, look at the voter map and specific demos (mainly educated voters). Huntsville, Bham, and Mobile will be as blue as the ocean. There will be a ton of crossover votes, people who are normally red and theyll vote blue.

edit: I know theyll be blue-ish anyway, just more so than usual
This post was edited on 8/29/18 at 9:00 am
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:24 am to
quote:

It's amazing to me the level of ignorance people display when discussing Alabama politics. Our state legislature was Democrat from the 1860s until 2010. There's no way anyone can make statements like the one quoted above if they know anything about the history of Alabama state government.





Those Democrats were also for the most part conservative. Party dynamics have changed on both sides since the Democrats in this state last controlled the state government. You show your ignorance when you don't recognize that. The Republicans representing the rural counties in this state aren't switching parties any time soon, and those areas aren't going to see a viable Democratic candidate anytime soon.

Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
46013 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:27 am to
quote:

I don't think the other candidates in the general election would be a better choice or represent my interests in our state government.


What interests are those exactly? I don't live in Alabama so I don't see this stuff on a daily basis, but just from looking at their websites, Maddox seems to have some fairly reasonable, well articulated positions and Ivey's is just a bunch of worn out conservative platitudes about protecting fetuses, guns, and Jesus.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Those Democrats were also for the most part conservative. Party dynamics have changed on both sides since the Democrats in this state last controlled the state government. You show your ignorance when you don't recognize that. The Republicans representing the rural counties in this state aren't switching parties any time soon, and those areas aren't going to see a viable Democratic candidate anytime soon.



Read it again: 2010. You're saying party dynamics have changed since 2010. You honestly think Democrats were conservative in 2010? You have no clue what you're talking about.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:40 am to
quote:

protecting fetuses, guns


Well those would be really big ones for me and most people in this state.
Posted by McGregor
Member since Feb 2011
6670 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:41 am to
politics/legislation in AL does not swing like it does on the national level from party to party.

It's hard to implement much policy without any funding.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:41 am to
quote:

After she wins, look at the voter map and specific demos (mainly educated voters). Huntsville, Bham, and Mobile will be as blue as the ocean.


You think this is because of educated voters?

Ridiculous.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:43 am to
quote:

It's hard to implement much policy without any funding.


This is the biggest problem in our state, and is a lasting impact of our history of Democrat rule. So many earmarks in our state budget that it is impossible to do anything. Earmarks in Alabama are the hugest problem out there, but no one in our state wants to fix that.

I'd vote for a Democrat who wanted to retroactively outlaw budget earmarks in a heartbeat. Same if they proposed combining the general and education budgets. We're so stupidly behind when it comes to our state budget practices and it is hurting most of our state services. We don't have a funding problem at all, we just always earmark funding when we pass it. You can always tell who the most "uneducated" voters in Alabama are when they scream their support of budget earmarks.
This post was edited on 8/29/18 at 9:47 am
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
46013 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:45 am to
quote:


Well those would be really big ones for me and most people in this state.


So wedge issues are what really matters to you? You don't seriously think that the state of Alabama is going to suddenly become pro-choice and send the cops around to confiscate your hunting rifles do you? That's ridiculous.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:49 am to
quote:

So wedge issues are what really matters to you? You don't seriously think that the state of Alabama is going to suddenly become pro-choice and send the cops around to confiscate your hunting rifles do you? That's ridiculous.


You can portray my views however you'd like. Doesn't make them any less important to me. I view the murder of unborn children as far more than a wedge issue. I find it hard to vote for anyone who supports it. Same with gun control. It doesn't really matter if someone "can" or "can't" get legislation through that would "take my guns away." I view this as an ethical issue. I cannot support someone who views fundamental rights with such obvious disregard. Shows a serious disrespect for our nation's Constitution and calls into question their ability to lead ethically.
This post was edited on 8/29/18 at 10:09 am
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Read it again: 2010. You're saying party dynamics have changed since 2010. You honestly think Democrats were conservative in 2010? You have no clue what you're talking about.



Sure, I don't. There's a long list of Alabama Republicans that switched parties from the Democratic party through the 80's and 90's. Those individuals were not, and are not, liberal in any sense of the word. There wasn't some magic switch in 2010 that flipped the dynamics. Conservative rule has been the rule in this state for decades, regardless of the political affiliation of the members.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62396 posts
Posted on 8/29/18 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Sure, I don't. There's a long list of Alabama Republicans that switched parties from the Democratic party through the 80's and 90's. Those individuals were not, and are not, liberal in any sense of the word. There wasn't some magic switch in 2010 that flipped the dynamics. Conservative rule has been the rule in this state for decades, regardless of the political affiliation of the members.



Again, clearly no clue what you're talking about. The Alabama Education Association was never conservative, and controlled a large portion of our state's government for a very long time due to their extremely large voting bloc.
This post was edited on 8/29/18 at 10:10 am
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter