Started By
Message

re: Nick Saban provides update on Alabama's ongoing QB battle

Posted on 8/22/18 at 9:54 am to
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 9:54 am to
Not directed at you, but i always take insider info with a grain of salt - because in the end they are likely all still voicing their own opinions on a fluid situation.

There are some who hear info from people directly involved, but that is probably few and far between - in my experience these people tend to keep any said info pretty close to the vest anyway.
This post was edited on 8/22/18 at 10:04 am
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 9:56 am to
quote:

observer's subjective opinion


Isn't the stuff in your reply the exact same thing, i.e. an observer's subjective opinion?

quote:

posting the contents of the email.


Not an option.

the only "weakness" is that it doesn't support what folks want to believe.
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 10:13 am to
quote:

i always take insider info with a grain of salt


Everything on this website should be taken with all the salt one can find. And unless Saban, Tua, or Jalen himself comes and posts on this forum, everything reported is observer opinion. And, yes, all opinions are subjective by definition.

The problem is that the masses want to believe a thing, and upon hearing info that supports that thing, then what they wanted to believe becomes gospel and supported fact in their minds.

I view all this inside info as an opportunity to get as many viewponts of a thing as possible, and try to find the truth in the middle. What baffles me is folks hating on another person for sharing privileged info. Seriously, why would a person go out of their way to hate on Boz, for example, saying, "He was wrong about X or Y"? Being wrong is not the point, and being wrong is part of the human experience. Boz, and others, just try to give a peek behind the curtain and attempt to gleen some takeaways. But many haters want to take these peeks as objective facts, llike children would, and get all mad if the result doesn't exactly match what the peek suggested. It's nonsense to approach it that way.
This post was edited on 8/22/18 at 10:20 am
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30875 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Some of you need to watch baseball or work or play with your kids between now and September.

This is not the Zapruder film. Just chill out.


..fricking drama queens.
Posted by UAgrad93
Sylacauga
Member since Oct 2015
1560 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Bear88
Based on what I saw this past Saturday, it was close. Jalen got off to a hot start with a couple of nice deep balls. Tua didn't get the big downfield throws early, but he threaded some needles and threw guys open. Jalen still has the tendency to look for the 1st read and then drift to his right if the 1st read isn't open. Tua may take a few more sacks trying to make all of the reads and progressions. Tua was more effective in red zone passing IMHO.

If I was faced with the decision, my thinking would be that Tua offers the better opportunity to "dictate to the defense what we want to do and not be forced to do what they want". They can't walk down safeties in an attempt to shutdown the run when there is more of a legit threat in the downfield passing game. Jalen would be an ideal QB in the more spread option QB run game with sprint out passes, shovel passes, and speed option concepts from the gun.
This post was edited on 8/22/18 at 11:24 am
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
14646 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 12:10 pm to
I gotcha. Thanks. For the record, I do take “insider” info with a grain of salt. I know some info is actually seen and some may be 2nd or 3rd hand info from someone who is there. But for most posters including myself, this is all we have to go on. lol . Drew DeArmond posts some stuff like it is not close but who knows. I do appreciate info and realize that it may or may not be fact. Just ready for the damn season! thanks again to all and Roll Tide
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
22304 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 12:48 pm to
No problem with people passing on inside info. I don’t hold it against people if they’re just relaying information from other sources. I even do that and I know not everything is always going to be accurate. This is a small state. We’re all probably 1 or 2 people removed from a legit source.

Do have a problem with the people who take on the mantle of Internet Oracle when all they really do is pass on vague or obvious info but talk as if they are always standing in between Paul Bryant Jr. and Angus Cooper at practice.
Posted by Bear88
Member since Oct 2014
14646 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

UAgrad93


Can you confirm that Tua took a safety and another bad sack? Just trying to vet the info of another source.
Posted by UAgrad93
Sylacauga
Member since Oct 2015
1560 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

prevatt33


One hand touch on the QB for a sack is BULLSHITE! They literally could swing a hand and catch the jersey with a fingernail and the whistle was blown. Former BAMA QB and another #13 David Smith was the white hat during the scrimmage.
They were working on 1st and 10 situations from inside the -5. Object was to get a first down or at least enough yards to give DeLong his needed 15 yards.
DeLong had a shank about this time as well. CNS was standing right next to him on the end line when he caught the snap.
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 2:42 pm to
Thanks for the added context. Many fans see stats and invent the context. Whether they were legit sacks or not, we'll never know. The issue to know is whether the QB made good or bad decisions on the play, regardless of the ticky-tack nature of the actual sack. That's tough to know as an observer, unless you can hear the coaches after the play.
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

A top BOL insider -- A few things: The scrimmage was more pass oriented to test the qbs so the dline was able to pin their ears back. Offensive line will be good. Only thing different about our front 7 is depth. Waddle is an absolute STUD.

The most important thing I want to relay is this is a scrimmage that both offense and defense pretty much knows what is coming. The secondary will improve alot the next two weeks once all the mixing and matching stops and we start to focus on a core group.

That was a tired team you saw today after a grueling two weeks of camp. Oh and take the over in our game against Louisville.

ETA: He was at the scrimmage.
This post was edited on 8/22/18 at 2:48 pm
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

UAgrad93


Let me throw another one at you:

This email I received indicated that from his observation, the offense operates more smoothly with Hurts in the game. He even went so far as to say Hurts was like a coach on the field, putting people in the right places, audibling, moving everyone around, orchestrating everything, etc., and that Tua is not at the same level as Hurts yet at the total running of the offense.

Is this something you saw also?

He also seemed to indicate that the post-scrimmage chatter among those viewing the 2nd scrimmage was as positive about Hurts as it was about Tua after scrimmage number 1. Did you notice this?

I am asking this because it ties in to what Surge posted from the BOL insider:

quote:

A BOL "insider" (connections) -- "Tua is qb1 and there legit is no debate. I’ve talked with several ppl and idc what any rec member is saying. The staff and players have long known Tua is qb1, and they’re only trying to find a role or how big of a role Jalen will have."


Dude specifically said " I don't care what any REC member is saying." In order to say this, there must be some REC insiders who are saying a different opinion, which is very interesting.
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Dude specifically said " I don't care what any REC member is saying." In order to say this, there must be some REC insiders who are saying a different opinion, which is very interesting.

REC membership doesn't make someone an insider. A true insider is someone who has connections to get info that comes from the Bama staff and players. Saban and his staff do address assembled REC members, but don't disclose much, if any, detailed information that they want kept secret.
This post was edited on 8/22/18 at 3:09 pm
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 3:01 pm to
I used the term "REC insider" to denote a member of the REC who's connected enough to be present at scrimmages/practices.

I agree that if you are not present or have direct inside info from players/coaches, then you just a dude like me...but with more money, apparently.
This post was edited on 8/22/18 at 3:04 pm
Posted by TidalSurge1
Ft Walton Beach
Member since Sep 2016
36467 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 3:07 pm to
I think all REC members were allowed to watch both fall camp scrimmages.
Posted by UAgrad93
Sylacauga
Member since Oct 2015
1560 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 5:29 pm to
I'm not really sure what he was looking at that led him to reach that conclusion. Both of them looked to be in command of protections, formations, etc. Now, I was talking with my 17 year old son as we watched. He is a LB and we talked A LOT about coverages more so than listening to hear if both were giving directions, etc.

As for post scrimmage chatter, I can only say that the guys I talked with that Jalen did look better in #2 scrimmage than in #1. I only attended the 2nd one, so I only had heresay to go off of. We were all still pretty much in agreement that, while Jalen did hit some first read deep throws, if #1 was covered, he bailed or drifted right and looked to run, not staying with the route progression. We said that "if Saban was going off JUST the 2nd scrimmage, then his decision would be a tough one to make." Tua still made some throws that made you simply say, "DAMN!" He threw one sideline route to Jeudy at around 15-20 yards from left hash to the right sideline on a damn rope! In red zone, he threw a low dart to a diving Derek Kief that only he had a chance to catch.

If we really looked at how Jalen got to 26-2, having a freaking BEAST for a defense, all of those NOTS in '16, performances against upper echelon defenses, then look at what Tua provided in his playing time during the season and in the Natty. Tua gives the offense more freedom to dictate run or pass. When those upper tier defenses loaded the box and forced Jalen to hit outside throws or deep throws, he struggled.
People will say that he would have won the Natty as a freshman IF the defense hadn't given up the final TD. I always point out that the defense played 99 damn snaps due mainly to 2-17 on third downs. Also, Jalen's final drive in that Natty never happens if not for the double pass completion by A Stewart to convert what, another 3rd down or was it 4th down.
I coached HS ball for 13 years, so I try and look at it from a coaching mindset and not the crazed fan. We are all passionate though about the Crimson and White!! I hope my old eyes and what I have tried to relay to y'all helps.
Posted by prevatt33
Member since Dec 2011
2837 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 6:00 pm to
Many thanks.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
24402 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 6:03 pm to
quote:

People will say that he would have won the Natty as a freshman IF the defense hadn't given up the final TD.

It irks me whenever I see people saying that. The offense sucked arse all night. They were living off big plays and couldn’t put together one long drive. It wasn’t all Hurts fault but he did nothing impressive outside of his TD run.

Meanwhile the defense held one of the top offenses in the nation to 7 points through 2.5 quarters. They made Clemson punt 11 times which is the most they’ve had to in a single game in over 2 years. They also forced and recovered 2 fumbles inside Clemson territory only for the offense to come away with negative yards and 3 points.

I know it’s mostly non-Bama fans that only remember the last 1.5 quarters of the game that say this, but there are also some Bama fans including here on this board that think the same thing.
Posted by JoseyWalesTheOutlaw
In The Ham
Member since Nov 2017
12564 posts
Posted on 8/22/18 at 6:36 pm to
I tend to listen to those people that attended the sessions that actually played the game of football and those that played at Bama much much more. The rest not so much.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter