
Devil03Dawg07
Favorite team: | Georgia ![]() |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | Hunting & College Football |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 56 |
Registered on: | 10/7/2020 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Should Vanderbilt move down to FCS in football?
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 8/25/24 at 8:52 pm
1) Vandy is more SEC than Texas will ever be!
2) Every school looks forward to road games in Nashville!
3) Vandy being a private school protects the conference from FOIA requests. This is far more important you realize.
2) Every school looks forward to road games in Nashville!
3) Vandy being a private school protects the conference from FOIA requests. This is far more important you realize.
re: Will UGA vs UT even matter?
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/17/23 at 5:38 am
Bump!
re: Will UGA vs UT even matter?
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 8/10/23 at 5:13 pm
quote:
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say yes it will matter.
They all matter...but conference or national implications...i don't know.
Will UGA vs UT even matter?
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 8/10/23 at 5:05 pm
For all the off-season talk about this game, is it even going to matter?
UGA schedule is soft by typical conference standards but it's not our fault we can't play ourselves, Sankey cancelled OU, we got an easy draw from the west, and the rest of our division schedule sets up favorably. That said, I fully expect the Dawgs to walk into knee land undefeated and in the drivers seat for a spot in the SEC championship/playoffs.
UT on the other hand will likely have some war wounds by November 18th. TSIO in Tuscaloosa is likely an L. Bama is much more talented and now out for revenge. Furthermore, I don't think UT has reached the level where @SWAMP, @ZOU, 8-4, @Kroger (immediately after TSIO), or the COCKS are gimmies. I think there's at least 1 loss there meaning that Vols really aren't in contention for SEC/Playoffs assuming UGA comes in undefeated.
This is further compounded by the fact that King Kirby showed conference how to slow down UT. Not everyone in the conference has the personnel to pull it off....but several do....and UGA certainly does...if the game actually matters for the SEC east.
Official Predictions:
-- UGA goes to Knoxville undefeated and UT has 2 losses.
-- Tickets are trading for 80% less on the secondary market by game week than they are today. Currently $365 to get in the stadium and an average of over $500.
-- A rowdy crowd at kickoff looses energy quickly and UGA runs out the clock for most of the second half with a 38-21 win.
-- UGA clinches SEC East in Knoxville.
UGA schedule is soft by typical conference standards but it's not our fault we can't play ourselves, Sankey cancelled OU, we got an easy draw from the west, and the rest of our division schedule sets up favorably. That said, I fully expect the Dawgs to walk into knee land undefeated and in the drivers seat for a spot in the SEC championship/playoffs.
UT on the other hand will likely have some war wounds by November 18th. TSIO in Tuscaloosa is likely an L. Bama is much more talented and now out for revenge. Furthermore, I don't think UT has reached the level where @SWAMP, @ZOU, 8-4, @Kroger (immediately after TSIO), or the COCKS are gimmies. I think there's at least 1 loss there meaning that Vols really aren't in contention for SEC/Playoffs assuming UGA comes in undefeated.
This is further compounded by the fact that King Kirby showed conference how to slow down UT. Not everyone in the conference has the personnel to pull it off....but several do....and UGA certainly does...if the game actually matters for the SEC east.
Official Predictions:
-- UGA goes to Knoxville undefeated and UT has 2 losses.
-- Tickets are trading for 80% less on the secondary market by game week than they are today. Currently $365 to get in the stadium and an average of over $500.
-- A rowdy crowd at kickoff looses energy quickly and UGA runs out the clock for most of the second half with a 38-21 win.
-- UGA clinches SEC East in Knoxville.
re: That crowd…
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 11/5/22 at 11:44 pm
Only time I can recall it being close to that loud was 2013 LSU…but that was really only the 4th quarter.
I was on the south side and I barely heard the redcoats all night, and I didn’t hear UTJr band a single time.
I was on the south side and I barely heard the redcoats all night, and I didn’t hear UTJr band a single time.
re: Kirby vs top 10 scoring offenses
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 11/2/22 at 7:49 pm
Oregon currently at #3 in total offense behind UGA and UTjr. Probably fair to assume that if they didn’t play UGA to kick off the season, they’d be higher.
re: The following teams have been ranked #1 in College Football Playoff Rankings
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 11/1/22 at 8:12 pm
2 of these are not like the others!
re: Brooks Austin? Online Commentator guy
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 10/8/22 at 1:57 pm
Personality aside, I’ve enjoyed his content historically. Seems different this year tho. A little watered down from where it once was.
re: Wisconsin FIRES HC
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 10/2/22 at 7:53 pm
Rumor mill in Badger land is that the Huskers asked for permission to talk to Jimmy Leonhard. No way UW was letting him walk out that door.
re: Should we do away with rent-a-win cupcake games?
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 4:09 pm
I agree with the need to keep small programs going bc it give incentivizes the high school kids and fuels development. I hate the argument that the only way to fund small programs is by playing them....especially multiple games a year.
If we move to 9 conference games, I'd like to see us max out the cupcakes at 1 game, add a buy week, and find a way to help share revenue with regionally appropriate FCS schools (aka SEC/Sunbelt, Big 10/MAC, Pac12/Mtn West etc). This could be done w a very small percentage of the new TV deal, a small percentage of gate, etc.
Unfortunately, greed will probably prevent this.
If we move to 9 conference games, I'd like to see us max out the cupcakes at 1 game, add a buy week, and find a way to help share revenue with regionally appropriate FCS schools (aka SEC/Sunbelt, Big 10/MAC, Pac12/Mtn West etc). This could be done w a very small percentage of the new TV deal, a small percentage of gate, etc.
Unfortunately, greed will probably prevent this.
re: Offensive vs Defensive "Minded" head coach
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 3:54 pm
quote:
If you watch USC right now they look like cookie cutter OU teams from 2015-2021
USC may be the only blue blood in the country where style is more important than Wins. Riley's a good fit.
re: Offensive vs Defensive "Minded" head coach
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 2:51 pm
quote:
Wait, where are you getting that Urban called the plays at UF?
good catch. I knew he called them at OSU but made a poor assumption he did so at UF.
I'll edit.

re: Question about defense for experts and football efficianados
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 2:41 pm
quote:
At this point last year UGA had 12 Sacks and 5 QB hurries. In 2022, they have 1 sack and 9 QB Hurries. How is this the same pass rushing team exactly?? I’d love to know
Our best pass rusher last year was kicked off the team immediately following the cocktail party last year. He probably would have been the 6th first rounder if not for legal issues. Our current defensive scheme is the same scheme we played with from in Nov, Dec, Jan.
re: What were your priorities in 1998?
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 1:46 pm
Mary Jane rotten crotch and her pretty pink panties.
re: Offensive vs Defensive "Minded" head coach
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 1:43 pm
quote:
Still believe defense is the way to go, but the offensive guys definitely make things more fun to watch. Both Bama & UGA typically have great offenses, but HCs that are defense centric.
The game became more offensive focused and Saban recognized the balance had to change. Bama shifted gears, went away from game manager QBs, and started putting up massive yards/ points.
I'm not sure this was as strategic or intentional as most people think. I give Saban all the credit in the world for brining in Kiffin/Sark and changing the offense, but loosing Kirby definitely impacted the defense (and thus the overall philosophy) ....and as more time goes by....the more you can see it. They still have the same caliber athletes, but the defensive results aren't the same.
Point being, I think Bama would still look a little more like the Bama of old if Kirby was still there. With Kirby gone, Saban continued to allow OCs to open up the offense more.
re: Is everyone else enjoying watching the Auburn implosion?
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 1:33 pm
Yeah. This is a lot of fun. They better hope conference realignment is good to them or they may be a decade or more coming out this (see Tennessee).
re: Offensive vs Defensive "Minded" head coach
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 1:28 pm
quote:
What about guys like Brian Kelly who started as softball coaches?
I was mostly looking at National Championship coaching histories, and we all know that BK falls under Not Applicable here....in any sport.
re: Offensive vs Defensive "Minded" head coach
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 1:20 pm
quote:
Take Sam Pittman for example. He was an All American defensive end in college and became one of the best offensive line coaches in America.
Fair point. Unfortunately, those type Head coaches seem perpetually very under-rated by fan bases & ADs, and are almost non-existent to the media until they are highly successful.
re: Question about defense for experts and football efficianados
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 1:11 pm
quote:
It means they have only beat shitty arse offenses so far. Did you not watch the SC game? And Oregon is a soft finesse team.
I can't wait to see how much time Hooker has in the pocket when Cooper Mayes has to line up against Jalen Carter. Of course they'll have to double Carter cause lil Coop absolutely will not be able to handle him solo, and when the double happens, one or our LB's gets pressure inside 3 seconds. Fun times.
Offensive vs Defensive "Minded" head coach
Posted by Devil03Dawg07 on 9/20/22 at 1:03 pm
Since coaching vacancies are already open and more are expected (Hi Auburn!), curious what the rant thinks about offensive vs defensive "minded" head coaches. We all know the offensive "geniuses" get all the press, but how often do they deliver the results? Some quick notes and data on offensive vs defensive head coaches in the CFP & BCS eras:
-- In the CFP era, head coaches with a defensive background have won 62% of that Natty's
-- In the BCS era, head coaches with an offensive background won 56% of the Nattys. IMO, I think this shows the flaw where the computers gave too much credit for margin of victory in the early years of BCS.
-- In both era's combined, offensive head coaches that directly ran the offense (called plays) only won the natty 8% of the time for a total 2 total times. Urban did it at OSU and Jimbo did it FSU. Edited: Urban didn't call plays at UF.
Seems to me that the formula for success is a defensive minded or CEO type Head coach with a really good offensive coordinator. Trying to find the next Urban has mostly yielded disappointing results for those in search of Nattys.
Thoughts?
-- In the CFP era, head coaches with a defensive background have won 62% of that Natty's
-- In the BCS era, head coaches with an offensive background won 56% of the Nattys. IMO, I think this shows the flaw where the computers gave too much credit for margin of victory in the early years of BCS.
-- In both era's combined, offensive head coaches that directly ran the offense (called plays) only won the natty 8% of the time for a total 2 total times. Urban did it at OSU and Jimbo did it FSU. Edited: Urban didn't call plays at UF.
Seems to me that the formula for success is a defensive minded or CEO type Head coach with a really good offensive coordinator. Trying to find the next Urban has mostly yielded disappointing results for those in search of Nattys.
Thoughts?
Popular