Favorite team:Missouri 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:217
Registered on:11/5/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

I wish someone would ask the president tomorrow to name just one!


that's the subtle, insidious nature of the way the GOP has been running things for the past several decades; it's not about preventing a specific person from voting, it's about making it so they can't all vote.

You close down all but 1 precinct in a pro-Democrat area. No one was denied the right to vote, but anyone who can't wait in line for 8 hours won't vote. It's genius in a way; voting only matters in the aggregate, so you make it as hard as possible for the other side to vote and as easy as possible for your side.
quote:

You progressives are so into negotiating that y’all want to simply remove the filibuster so you can negotiate even better.



are you under the impression that any negotiation goes on in the Senate?

The filibuster is an anti-democracy relic from the 1800's that the founding fathers would have despised.
quote:

Thats very kind of you, I'd have gone with ...

South Carolina is … the college football version of the Biden/Harris Administration.


put in a no-win situation by the incompetent previous administration?
quote:

You are an outright liar, get off this board and go spread your lies on reddit


let's see your link
quote:


Not in the younger brackets, which is where our players fit in. By a lot less



LINK
quote:

100% incorrect


you're talking out of your arse. There is no demographic for which flu is more dangerous than covid. Covid kills fewer younger people than older people. Great, so does influenza and every other disease.
quote:

So why don’t we do this? Because it’s unsustainable, just as it has been for covid


Because we're talking about a scale difference. The difference between tens of thousands of deaths and hundreds of thousands or even millions.

The sad part is that it isn't unsustainable if we'd just gotten our shite together and done it right from the start. Countries that are handling this well are having very few cases right now and so they can trace the cases they do have, which means they can go out and do as they like for the most part. The only reason social distancing and staying home and the like are still so important to us is that we never got things under control in the first place.
quote:

There are millions of us who will brave it for you. Stay home. Not sure why generations of people have to stay at home just so they don’t get 85 year old grandma sick.

But you got your wish. Sounds like the game is off.


Yes, you're not sure why you should do something for the good of someone else. That's why we are where we are as a nation, in a nutshell.
quote:

Whatever, it's not apples to apples and you know that.


No, it's not. Flu kills a tiny fraction of the number that covid does each year, but it does so exclusively in the fall and winter (which we're just entering) and it does so without mass efforts at distancing and mask-wearing and the like. If we put the effort into not catching the flu that we have for covid the number of flu deaths would be cut drastically, even with a vaccine.
quote:

That might have something to do with us having a vaccine for the flu


We don't have 'a vaccine' for the flu. We have different vaccines for the flu every year because it's a rapidly changing virus that has to be predicted rather than reacted to.
quote:

It’s really not unless you’re overweight, elderly, or an underlying condition.

Y’all can stay home if you’re scared.


You have no idea what you're talking about. Every disease is more likely to kill someone who has underlying conditions. There is 0 scientific evidence to suggest that Covid is less deadly than flu for any age group, any demographic. It's complete bullshite. The worst flu season of the past decade, according to the CDC, killed about 60,000 people. We're closing in on four times that dying to covid. Most years about 30-40,000 die from influenza. We'll probably end up around 10x that number, and that's despite all the effort and precautions we've put into fighting covid.
quote:

For college students this is correct, for the general population this is insanely incorrect



It's not even true for college students. Which is why the 'it's only killing old people' argument has always been dumb. Diseases kill old people more easily than young people. News at 11. Covid is more dangerous than flu in every age bracket. By a lot in most cases.
quote:

He is the only leader with balls. He is letting human beings make their own decisions. The horror


You mean he's letting human beings make poor decisions for others.
I'm guessing this is just a way for the bigger programs to avoid having to pay SE Bumfrick St a million bucks to come and get their arse kicked (or, in Tennessee'scase, administer an arse kicking) in front of an empty stadium.

re: Week 8 SP+ Picks

Posted by tigooner on 10/17/19 at 10:21 pm
quote:

That's not entirely true. Saying it's math makes it seem like this concrete thing that yields only correct results. It's data to which he applies his own weights.

I don't put any stock in these, because I don't really believe in relying on predictive models to tell what's going to happen in a game where a star player could have a bad game because he woke up in the wrong mood.

For example, the week 7 pick for UGA/SC was 36-17 in favor of the dawgs. While I understand that was an outlier, shite like that happens all the time.

They are fun numbers to look at, but I put absolutely no stock into them when I'm deciding my picks.


It's a probabilistic projection. It's always going to give you what it sees as the single most likely outcome out of a vast number of possible outcomes. That doesn't mean that the particular outcome it forecasts is likely to happen; in fact, they'll barely ever nail the score exactly. It's a median result; if the math is right each team will outperform the projection roughly half the time.

re: Week 8 SP+ Picks

Posted by tigooner on 10/17/19 at 10:15 pm
quote:


They’ve heavily underestimated LSUs offense all season so I’m not surprised. Whatever predicative math used hasn’t been accurate at all on that front.



of course it's underestimated LSU's offense. LSU's offense has pretty much hit its best possible outcome. Any LSU fan who says they thought before the season that LSU would have one of the 2 or 3 best offenses in the country is lying.

re: SEC total team talent ranked by 247.

Posted by tigooner on 10/14/19 at 6:01 pm
quote:

Or they just suck


that's some real Occam's razor shite right there.
so we whip your arse every year with less talented players and you think that's an argument in your favor?
quote:

Our players ride your Momma and Michael Sam's asses like sleds. That's how they get into the stadium.


Please, Michael Sam accomplished more in the SEC than your entire roster. Your players are clearly the subs in that relationship.

re: SEC total team talent ranked by 247.

Posted by tigooner on 10/14/19 at 5:31 pm
quote:

What this tells me is there are multiple mediocre coaches who recruit well at traditional powers.



Most college football coaches are snake oil salesmen. It's far easier and you get much a much longer leash by recruiting well and underachieving against your recruiting rankings than you do by working hard to build your program from within and selling high school kids on continuity and competence.