Started By
Message
What does it say that nobody has mentioned Chubb's absence as a factor?
Posted on 10/1/16 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 10/1/16 at 8:40 pm
Thought we actually ran the ball fairly well today. Anyone wonder if Chubb would've changed the game any?
7
Posted on 10/1/16 at 8:42 pm to tylerdurden24
When the meaning is unclear, there is no meaning.
-Herman Cain
-Herman Cain
Posted on 10/1/16 at 8:43 pm to tylerdurden24
Herrien is a beast. He carried guys for yard after contact.
Posted on 10/1/16 at 8:43 pm to tylerdurden24
Running back was super solid today. I honestly think Michel and Herrien are better than Chubb right now. Chubb might have helped in pass protection though.
Posted on 10/1/16 at 8:43 pm to tylerdurden24
Other than the UNC game, he's pretty much been a non-factor. It is what it is.
Posted on 10/1/16 at 8:49 pm to tylerdurden24
I think it just says that the other guys are solid and performing well and while it would be nice to have him back the running game is in pretty good shape at least as far as the RBs are concerned.
Posted on 10/1/16 at 10:08 pm to Litigator
It means nothing
Posted on 10/1/16 at 10:10 pm to tylerdurden24
Unless he could've defended against that last pass, not playing had zero outcome
Posted on 10/2/16 at 1:07 am to Lilarny
I'm still wondering what's up with Chubb,Cube is right kinda just been sputtering
Posted on 10/2/16 at 6:56 am to tylerdurden24
We didn't expect him to play and he only ran the ball once the entire game. In his current condition, I think Chubb would have been more of a liability than a positive factor in the game. He's definitely not the same as he was before the injury which was to be expected.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News