Started By
Message
re: What do you expect out of Chaney play calling wise?
Posted on 7/3/16 at 11:43 pm to WhopperDawg
Posted on 7/3/16 at 11:43 pm to WhopperDawg
Yea,probably closer to 28 ppg
0
Posted on 7/4/16 at 8:49 am to WhopperDawg
quote:
Yeah, me too. The point is 33 is not half way between shithead and bobo.
You’re right. I was off by 0.8
In Bobo’s last year, UGA averaged 41.3 points a game compared to only 26.3 by Squattin’heimer….so the midway point would be 33.8 instead of 33.0. Sorry for the math error. Was going off memory
And I realize that any points the defense may have scored off turnovers or by special teams are counted in this number. But, so what? Any points the offense gave up on turnovers to opposing defenses or to special teams would be counted in average points allowed per game, so it basically all washes out.
41.3 points per game is a UGA record, I believe. Pretty impressive. Seriously, why do you still hate Bobo?
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:49 am to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Seriously, why do you still hate Bobo?
I don't give a shite about bobo, he is gone never to return.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 11:06 am to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Chaney is supposedly some kind of versatile wizard in Kirby's eyes that utilizes personnel strengths, no matter what they may be. And isn't stubborn to one singular philosophy. We shall see.
Pretty much the same as I feel. Use our receivers to stretch the field, our TS's to spread the defense and our running backs to close them up. Take advantage of our strengths. Show a little stupid stuff just to waste future opponents film sessions and practice time. Be prepared to run the ball down their throat at the end of a game to close it out. Most of all, execute the plays with out penalties or mistakes.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 12:09 pm to hangingdawg
I think most will be surprised at how good our Wrs are going to be. I know they're young, but there is immense talent and the freshmen, especially Ridley, will be quick learners and will contribute from the start.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 12:42 pm to Jefferson Dawg
I looked up the '14 stats and gave me the '13 ppg average (around 37)
The 33ppg vs ranked teams in '14 pretty close though
Either way,Bobo was vastly underapreciated and was obviously missed
The 33ppg vs ranked teams in '14 pretty close though
Either way,Bobo was vastly underapreciated and was obviously missed
Posted on 7/4/16 at 1:33 pm to RD Dawg
The crazy thing though is that despite 41 points per game one year and only 26 the next.....they both earned us the exact same result. 10 & 3
That almost seems impossible. 41.3 ppg is the UGA record high. And 26.3 ppg is probably close to the record low of the modern era.
That almost seems impossible. 41.3 ppg is the UGA record high. And 26.3 ppg is probably close to the record low of the modern era.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 1:50 pm to Jefferson Dawg
The 2015 team would have gone 7-5 against the 2014 schedule.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 3:29 pm to VADawg
Why? Because we played Arkansas instead of Alabama? 
I guess USCe was better in '14, but we lost to them anyway. Other than that, schedules were pretty similar difficulty-wise IMO.
I guess USCe was better in '14, but we lost to them anyway. Other than that, schedules were pretty similar difficulty-wise IMO.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 3:57 pm to VADawg
If my Aunt had a dick she'd be my uncle.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 4:56 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
I guess USCe was better in '14, but we lost to them anyway. Other than that, schedules were pretty similar difficulty-wise IMO.
Played 5 ranked teams in '14 and ended up 4-1 with an average victory margin of 27 points.Including 44 on the #1 ranked defense (Clemson)
The victory margin vs ranked teams is a UGA record BTW
Played 3 in '15 and got skunked.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 5:22 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Played 5 ranked teams in '14 and ended up 4-1
Ranked when we played them, or ranked at the end of the year? ALabama '15 cancels out Clemson '14. So, beyond that...name a team we played in '14 that was better than they were in '15....
That would be USCe (loss) and Tech (loss). Auburn is basically a wash.
'14 and '15 were carbon copies difficulty-wise.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 5:40 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
ranked at the end of the year? ALabama '15 cancels out Clemson '14. So, beyond that...name a team we played in '14 that was better than they were in '15....
Ranked at the end of the year.Missouri,Auburn and GT were all ranked and better in '14 along with our bowl opponent Louisville (over PSU)
Posted on 7/4/16 at 8:02 pm to RD Dawg
Lambert would of beaten miZzzouri too when Maulk is hungover throwing 7 interceptions. Also, we lost to Tech in '14 so that's nullified. Honestly I don't even know what we're debating . Kirby needs to hit fairways and sink putts. Instead of Richt being good on offense and bad on defense one year. Then flipping it over the next. Fairways and greens. Birdie the holes you are suppose to.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 8:39 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Birdie the holes you are suppose to.
Correct,lost to 2 unranks that we never should have lost to and crushed teams that we were barely favored to beat (Mizzou and Arky) or underdogs to (Auburn)
quote:
Tech in '14 so that's nullified.
Is still doesn'the take away from GT being a top 10 team and
making our '14 schedule more difficult than '15
quote:
Lambert would of beaten miZzzouri too when Maulk is hungover throwing
Very doubtful but we also had Chubb healthy...Schotty would have screwed that game up somehow.
'14 was a strange season.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:10 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Very doubtful but we also had Chubb healthy...Schotty would have screwed that game up somehow.
Schottenheimer was bad but he wasn't bad enough for the offense to score negative points against Missouri. We did shut them out that day.
Posted on 7/4/16 at 10:21 pm to VADawg
quote:
the offense to score negative points
Thanks for that clarification.Had no idea.
Point is,that we have no idea what situations our beloved ex OC
would put us into.Multiple 3 and outs,pick sixes,stupid 4th down calls,etc and with Lambert at the helm it makes him that much worse as an OC.
This post was edited on 7/5/16 at 8:47 am
Posted on 7/5/16 at 9:47 am to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
quote:
Played 5 ranked teams in '14 and ended up 4-1
Ranked when we played them, or ranked at the end of the year? ALabama '15 cancels out Clemson '14. So, beyond that...name a team we played in '14 that was better than they were in '15....
That would be USCe (loss) and Tech (loss). Auburn is basically a wash.
'14 and '15 were carbon copies difficulty-wise.
You need to smoke some weed. Sos ranks:
2014: 8
2015: 55
Posted on 7/5/16 at 9:49 am to VADawg
quote:
The 2015 team would have gone 7-5 against the 2014 schedule
Very likely
Posted on 7/5/16 at 7:26 pm to Jefferson Dawg
quote:
Also, we lost to Tech in '14 so that's nullified. Honestly I don't even know what we're debating .
Your logic is incredibly off base, and how do you not know we are debating how much tougher the 2014 schedule was compared to the easy 2015?
This post was edited on 7/5/16 at 7:27 pm
Page 2 of 3
Latest Georgia News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News