Started By
Message
re: i keep hearing about penalties Georgia should have gotten the other night.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:07 pm to GT1
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:07 pm to GT1
quote:
There is no video angle to show it, but sometimes common sense prevails.
Nowhere in the college football rules book does it state to rely on common sense, or an interpretation of physics for that matter, in the absence of visual evidence. It's just as plausible that King's face mask hit the back of Jackson's helmet causing his head to move back and the crown knocked the ball loose. But there is no irrefutable video evidence (by your own admission) which is absolutely necessary to overturn the non-call on the field.
Aren't you techtards supposed to be champions of logic instead of whiny little bitches?
1
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:13 pm to GT1
quote:
I'm out of here after this just was dropping by to show you the proof.
No, you tucked your little stinger arse and got the hell out of dodge when confronted but we both know you're back here reading these replies. You cant help yourself.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:15 pm to tgdawg68
He's probably curled up on the floor crying
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:42 pm to tgdawg68
quote:
No, you tucked your little stinger arse and got the hell out of dodge when confronted but we both know you're back here reading these replies. You cant help yourself.
Lol when confronted? You guys have made zero argument since. And yes there have been plenty of times targeting has been called when there isn't a clear front facing video view. It doesn't matter if King is between the tackles either, that isn't anywhere in the rule. Besides, Jackson comes in from the edge at an angle and launches with his head completely down. He hits damn near every qualifier for targeting when you only need one for it to be a penalty. I guess it's like one of the comments on this tweet... yeah we needed video to prove that it wasnt an angel in the backfield that gave him an uppercut the same time Jackson hit him. FOH with that. You guys realize that when literally EVERYBODY is on the other side of an argument as you, you are most assuredly the one who is wrong. This was made by an NFL and CFB rules analyst, one of the guys that helped write the damn targeting rule.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:43 pm to tgdawg68
quote:
Nowhere in the college football rules book does it state to rely on common sense, or an interpretation of physics for that matter, in the absence of visual evidence. It's just as plausible that King's face mask hit the back of Jackson's helmet causing his head to move back and the crown knocked the ball loose. But there is no irrefutable video evidence (by your own admission) which is absolutely necessary to overturn the non-call on the field.
You can't really be this stupid.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:44 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
Is this targeting?
LINK
Yep. They missed that one. Don't know how it would have played out from there but that was early in the game and you continued to get your arse whipped until 5 mins to go from that point so probably wouldn't have changed anything.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:46 pm to GT1
Even your boy said it wasn't. And he was hit. Imagine that. Cry harder.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:48 pm to Spaceman Spiff
If you’re begging for targeting calls on a dive up the middle of the LOS, just call football a lost cause and put flags on them and make it 7 on 7
Posted on 12/3/24 at 12:59 pm to Spaceman Spiff
quote:
Even your boy said it wasn't. And he was hit. Imagine that. Cry harder.
He said that immediately after the game when he was pissed at himself for fumbling. He was visibly stunned for a second before he got up and I guarantee you after seeing replay he would tell you differently now. Oh and by the way, that SEC crew was supposed to be reffing the Championship game this week and guess what? They just got reprimanded and taken off that game because of what happened last week. So yeah it's only me, poor wittle ole tech fan, the one complaining about them. Loser arses can't even be a grown arse man and admit you got help. Ain't ever seen such a sore winner lol.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 1:07 pm to GT1
quote:
guarantee you
:lol:
Posted on 12/3/24 at 1:18 pm to GT1
quote:
Yep. They missed that one. Don't know how it would have played out from there but that was early in the game and you continued to get your arse whipped until 5 mins to go from that point so probably wouldn't have changed anything.
You mean extending a possession and the field position along with having one of your fragile Dbs ejected wouldn’t have done anything? And this isn’t between the tackled in a pile. Open field. Clear as day.
We also got called for defensive holding when one of your lineman chop blocked us while the puller also had his arm on him, which by rule is a chop block. You got 15 yards and a drive extended. Two huge calls at critical times in the game.
Let’s call this for what this is. You knew you had us. You could taste it. Then your exhausted and battered QB (who I have a ton of respect for in how he played) ran upright into the A gap and didn’t protect the ball and our guy put a hat on it and caused a fumble. And even with the refs spotting you a cheap PI in OT putting the ball on the 1 yard line, Tech could not finish.
It was an overall well played game by Tech other than the low level chop and cut blocks. It was a tough way to lose. Take it like a man. Not like the Tech Flag boy.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 1:42 pm to Peter Buck
This is great! Their tears flow like wine.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:46 pm to Peter Buck
quote:
You mean extending a possession and the field position along with having one of your fragile Dbs ejected wouldn’t have done anything? And this isn’t between the tackled in a pile. Open field. Clear as day.
That was your 2nd drive of the game. DB got hurt there and didn't play again so the ejection wouldn't have changed anything. You got several first downs and kept driving after that before turning it over on downs when you couldn't pick up a 3rd and 1 or a 4th and 1, so no I still say it wouldn't have changed anything. And if you want to whine about other calls that weren't made, there's also this one:
Open field. King already being tackled (defenseless player). Helmet straight to the head. No flag.
LINK
quote:
We also got called for defensive holding when one of your lineman chop blocked us while the puller also had his arm on him, which by rule is a chop block. You got 15 yards and a drive extended. Two huge calls at critical times in the game.
Our puller did not have his arm on your guy on that play. Your guy had our C by the collar pulling him down well before the cut block came in. I will gladly provide you the slo-mo video if you like. It wasn't a chop block. It may could have been called an illegal cut block because he wasn't directly in front of the guy who cut him, but our C wasn't engaged with him. He was engaged with our C by pulling his collar. The flag was out before the cut block even occurred. At worst it would have been offsetting penalties. That happened on a 1st down run that already went for like 9 yards so it didn't "extend" a drive.
quote:
Let’s call this for what this is. You knew you had us. You could taste it. Then your exhausted and battered QB (who I have a ton of respect for in how he played) ran upright into the A gap and didn’t protect the ball and our guy put a hat on it and caused a fumble. And even with the refs spotting you a cheap PI in OT putting the ball on the 1 yard line, Tech could not finish.
It was an overall well played game by Tech other than the low level chop and cut blocks. It was a tough way to lose. Take it like a man. Not like the Tech Flag boy.
Sorry but I'm going to have to disagree. If you want to talk about a cheap PI, regardless of if that ball was tipped, the PI call there was even weaker. That happened on 4th down when you would have turned the ball over to us. It was nothing to do with us not being able to finish. And for all those so called cut and chop blocks... I counted less than 10 and they were all backside cuts not even cuts in front of the running lane. This isn't Paul Johnson's offense with 285lb OL diving at you. So we did it 10x out of 93 offensive plays. Or let's talk about the no-hold call that would have made it 2nd and 20 for your boys with less than a minute to tie it up.
This post was edited on 12/3/24 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:47 pm to GT1
Cry Cry Little Tittie Baby.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:49 pm to GT1
Not going to tell you again, its wasn't targeting
Quit being a pussy and take your L like you have been for the last 7 years
Quit being a pussy and take your L like you have been for the last 7 years
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:53 pm to Dawg4Life47
quote:
Not going to tell you again, its wasn't targeting
Quit being a pussy and take your L like you have been for the last 7 years
You don't have to tell me anything. You're only telling yourself and other UGA fans. Literally everybody else that has anything to do with football, college or pro, says it's targeting. That's all I need. Do you really think everybody else is wrong and you are right? It's a GD wonder y'all can even read.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:54 pm to GT1
Get the frick out bug
Lew ban this frick tard already
Lew ban this frick tard already
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:58 pm to GT1
Loved watching your bitch arse coach cry in my coaches arms comforting him
Posted on 12/3/24 at 3:59 pm to GT1
quote:
Literally everybody else that has anything to do with football, college or pro, says it's targeting.
Except the guys in the replay booth who can call it from the booth. They reviewed it and didn't call it either.
Posted on 12/3/24 at 4:08 pm to GT1
quote:
You can't really be this stupid.
Aside from your substantive rebuttal it's amazing that you don't understand that you cannot infer something that is not evident and overturn that call.
Your team had multiple other opportunities to win that game but they just couldn't get it done. I know it hurts which kinda makes it more satisfying.
Page 3 of 5
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News