Started By
Message
re: Falcons Board: In a surprising move the Saints board predicts we'll lose.
Posted on 1/12/13 at 7:46 pm to BeefDawg
Posted on 1/12/13 at 7:46 pm to BeefDawg
We had 378 rushing attempts this year vs 453 attempts last year. Our team rushing yardage is 1400 which is 29th in the league.
Our yardage from screens with running backs is 730.
If you don't take that into consideration and only point out the poor rushing yardage, then you're just not very good at this analysis stuff and your arguments are weak.
Our yardage from screens with running backs is 730.
If you don't take that into consideration and only point out the poor rushing yardage, then you're just not very good at this analysis stuff and your arguments are weak.
Posted on 1/12/13 at 7:47 pm to DawgHolliday
I think the 1 pm game tomorrow which would be a 10 AM game for the Seahawks and traveling to the East Coast two straight weeks plays into our favor big time. If we can keep it close till halftime we'll take over and win.
Posted on 1/12/13 at 8:00 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
If you don't take that into consideration and only point out the poor rushing yardage, then you're just not very good at this analysis stuff and your arguments are weak.
I believe I agreed with you that the screen game has been effective and that it was an extension of the running game. So...I have taken it into consideration.
I also provided OTHER reasons why I felt it was a bad matchup for the Falcons.
I am sorry that you want so badly to fight about this and belittle me for my opinions about why its a bad matchup. If it makes you feel big to do so then...by all means, carry on.
Just know three things:
1 - It is your OPINION that I am not very good at this analysis stuff.
2 - Your OPINION that my arguments are weak but, I dont think there is any reason to belittle you for either of your opinions.
3 - Continuing to ignore all other points made and focusing on just the screen game/running game point does not lend strength to your own argument.
Posted on 1/12/13 at 8:07 pm to DawgHolliday
I'd like to point toward two games in particular.
The Giants and Saints games. Both games were either matters of revenge or to prove something.
We wanted revenge on the Saints which resulted in picking off Brees 5 times and ending his touchdown streak.
We wanted to prove something against the Giants as well as revenge. We ended up hammering Eli and his Giants 34-0.
This game I feel will be close but a Falcons win none the less. Atlanta wants to prove that they can win a playoff game and I think they do tomorrow. Plus if we can confuse the likes of Brees and the Manning brothers I think we can confuse a rookie.
Oh one more thing we are 3-1 this season against mobile quarterbacks and undefeated against such at home.
The Giants and Saints games. Both games were either matters of revenge or to prove something.
We wanted revenge on the Saints which resulted in picking off Brees 5 times and ending his touchdown streak.
We wanted to prove something against the Giants as well as revenge. We ended up hammering Eli and his Giants 34-0.
This game I feel will be close but a Falcons win none the less. Atlanta wants to prove that they can win a playoff game and I think they do tomorrow. Plus if we can confuse the likes of Brees and the Manning brothers I think we can confuse a rookie.
Oh one more thing we are 3-1 this season against mobile quarterbacks and undefeated against such at home.
Posted on 1/12/13 at 8:10 pm to DawgHolliday
quote:
The Panthers (a bad team with a mobile, athletic QB) beat us once and really should have beaten us the other time. RGIII and the Redskins gave the Falcons all they could handle.
Wait, you just gave examples of two teams we beat as a reason for us losing.
Ummm, yeah ok. SMH
quote:
Finally, I just dont think the Falcons are as battle tested as the Seahawks. The schedule was pretty weak in my opinion.
People keep saying this but it's a crock. Th WL record of our opponents means jack squat when we all really know most of those teams seriously under performed and were originally picked to be better.
We beat both Mannings, shut one of them out, held Brees to no passing TDs and 5 interceptions one game, held Matt Stafford to no passing TDs one game, held Philip Rivers to no passing TDs one game, beat Tony Romo and intercepted him 3x, beat RG III and held them to their lowest rushing game of the year, beat Vick and Philly, and shut down Josh Freeman and Doug Martin in Tampa for their lowest rushing game of the year.
So sure, we lost to Carolina and Tampa in garbage time after we had already locked up the best record and home field advantage.
If you're going to base all your feelings off of garbage time games and ignore the incredible shite we did the rest of the season, then you're just being foolish. As foolish as basing a strength of schedule off opponent WLs alone and ignoring the fact we beat the shite out of 10 great QBs preventing most of them from coming close to doing what they normally do.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:50 pm to BeefDawg
So far, so good Beef...I hope I continue to be incorrect all day 
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top


1




