Started By
Message
re: Carter, Bellamy, Michel and Chubb
Posted on 12/16/16 at 12:28 am to BoogerSykes
Posted on 12/16/16 at 12:28 am to BoogerSykes
quote:
I asked this question in the recruiting board, do we lose Swift and Toneil now?
Probably not. Remember we signed Chubb and Michel when Gurley and Marshall had two years of eligibility left.
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 12:53 am
0
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:16 am to meansonny
quote:
don't see it. I can see us play calling around it. But we may have 4 positions on the OL manned by a new player. Reps and experience matter
Clemson got to the NC game last year with 5 new starters on the OL.
We'll have 3 maybe 4 plus experienced TE's and hopefully big Ben ready.Talent will be there lets see how Pittman & Co respond
#cupboard is full in '17
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 7:28 am
Posted on 12/16/16 at 7:26 am to meansonny
quote:
But we may have 4 positions on the OL manned by a new player. Reps and experience matter.
Then they should have been getting those reps this past season. If our OL was as bad as many on here believe, we should have started getting ready for next season by playing people where they would be playing in 2017. Instead we salvaged an 8-4 year and put ourselves behind for next year, too?
We should be very, very good net year. If we don't win the East, then we are in serious trouble.
This post was edited on 12/16/16 at 7:29 am
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:08 am to DawgsLife
Our Oline roster isn't bad especially with the 4*JUCO coming in. That 2015 conditioning program that made our line weak on both sides of the ball was arse. After 2 years removed I think the 2017 Oline will be worlds better.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:57 am to DawgRff
quote:
the 2017 Oline will be worlds better.
I hope you are right!
Posted on 12/16/16 at 11:41 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Clemson got to the NC game last year with 5 new starters on the OL.
We shuffled the ship in 2011 and it didn't work out well to start the season. I'm thinking 2011 is more the norm than Clemson (who had a mobile QB that could create his own good fortune from a busted play).
Agree to disagree. If the offense is humming, it is masking our warts (a healthy Chubb and receivers with sticky hands can do that).
Posted on 12/16/16 at 6:22 pm to meansonny
Agree to disagree. If the offense is humming, it is masking our warts (a healthy Chubb and receivers with sticky hands can do that).
FAR more talent than UF had on the OL had the last 2 years and skill positions aren't even up for discussion.
FAR more talent than UF had on the OL had the last 2 years and skill positions aren't even up for discussion.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 8:06 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
FAR more talent than UF had on the OL had the last 2 years and skill positions aren't even up for discussion
Florida beat us this year because of two poorly timed drops right before halftime and because our OL got pushed into the backfield on damn near every play
Posted on 12/16/16 at 9:24 pm to VADawg
quote:
Florida beat us this year because of two poorly timed drops right before halftime and because our OL got pushed into the backfield on damn near every play
Jesus,not the point...just comparing to the 2 OFFENSIVE rosters and what each school has accomplished.
Amazing how much better the O-line became after the UF game.Gee,wonder if our vaunted O-line coach made some adjustments.
Posted on 12/16/16 at 10:15 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Jesus,not the point...just comparing to the 2 OFFENSIVE rosters and what each school has accomplished
What does Jesus have to do with this?
And why are you so confident that their talent is less? They have better talent at OL. They have better talent at WR. It isn't always cut and dry. Our QB was under center for the first time this year. I don't think they were breaking in a QB the same way as us.
Page 6 of 6
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News