3
Started By
Message
This shouldn't even be reviewed clear fumble
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:13 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:13 am
(no message)
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:15 am to crimsoncoded94
You’re right. A forward moving arm releasing a forward moving ball by the qb behind the line of scrimmage shouldn’t be reviewed for a fumble.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:20 am to crimsoncoded94
His intent wasn't to throw, but his intent wasn't to fumble either...
hmmmm
hmmmm
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:22 am to crimsoncoded94
Clearly not a forward pass.
Bama offense looks good early.
Bama offense looks good early.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:22 am to Chicken
If refs can determine intent now, we’re all fricked.
I thought the rule was arm moving forward but they seem to make up calls on the fly.
I thought the rule was arm moving forward but they seem to make up calls on the fly.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:25 am to GatorNation4Lyfe
quote:
If refs can determine intent now, we’re all fricked.
Thank you. There’s an objective rule for arm mechanics and the physics of the ball. Not one for claiming the intent of the player (which was Matt Austin’s opinion). That’s wild.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:27 am to GatorNation4Lyfe
quote:
If refs can determine intent now
Don’t worry, that’s only against the Saints
Posted on 10/3/26 at 11:28 am to pgaddxn
quote:
Clearly not a forward pass.
I mean, not by the definition in the NCAA rulebook, but ok.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News