Started By
Message
re: So some gamblers are going to sue after Western Michigan got hosed right?
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:33 pm to billjamin
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:33 pm to billjamin
quote:
This was actually worse because it was reviewed. And that play made me break up with the NFL. I’m still not over it.
True. But one call cost a team a Super Bowl. A blown call on the field or in the review booth is still a blown call.
1
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:36 pm to CarolinaSandstorm
Who would have bet on Western Michigan?
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:41 pm to CarolinaSandstorm
It would only affect the very small number of gamblers who bet on the WMU moneyline. Bettors who bet on WMU on a +27.5 point spread still easily covered.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:55 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
A blown call on the field or in the review booth is still a blown call.
This was not a blown call. This was not a mistake. This was fraud.
Posted on 9/6/26 at 12:46 am to MaroonNation
quote:
Who would have bet on Western Michigan?
Someone who knows more about football than most
Clearly Western Michigan was the better team
Posted on 9/6/26 at 12:59 am to Eldodroptop
Looks like the clock was at 8 seconds before the QB catches the snap. 1 second to snap the ball does not seem right. Maybe they started the clock early?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News