Started By
Message

re: Hogs land 4* Barry Dunning

Posted on 7/6/21 at 1:50 pm to
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Maybe you don’t realize USA is the hometown team and there was some pressure to stay at home and be the face of the team.


There are also plenty of times that players will put the "local" school in there to give them some credit as well. Seems like Memphis was the biggest push at the end.

As for the whole thread, people need to pay more attention to basketball recruiting.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13343 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

You act like Alabama is some hotbed of talent or something. He’s the 77th ranked player who had South Alabama in his top 3.


Alabama posters are the ones acting like Alabama is some hotbed of talent. Kid is the 77th ranked player in the country. But naw, we'll take a pass on him. He doesn't really fit our groove. Whatever. Glad you feel that way, I guess.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Alabama posters are the ones acting like Alabama is some hotbed of talent. Kid is the 77th ranked player in the country. But naw, we'll take a pass on him. He doesn't really fit our groove. Whatever. Glad you feel that way, I guess.



I mean, yea. It's basketball, fit to a style is kind of important once you get past the ultra elite top 10-15 guys who work in any system.

Signing a bunch of random guys just because they were ranked between #70-100 and didn't fit together in any way is what we did for a decade before Oats showed up.

Muss has a style, Dunning fits it. Oats has a style, Dunning doesn't exactly fit it to a T. Arkansas made it clear he fit and is a great program. He made the right choice.
This post was edited on 7/6/21 at 2:18 pm
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 2:14 pm to
quote:


Alabama posters are the ones acting like Alabama is some hotbed of talent. Kid is the 77th ranked player in the country. But naw, we'll take a pass on him. He doesn't really fit our groove. Whatever. Glad you feel that way, I guess.


The two first Bama posters did post some snarky remarks but the others talking about fit are right.

Its perfectly normal and fine though, plenty of really good players on one team that wouldn't work on a different one.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Its perfectly normal and fine though, plenty of really good players on one team that wouldn't work on a different one


Yep - what really matters is being able to identify the guys who fit what you do, which is something we did a horrible job at for the 10 years between early Gottfried and Oats, mainly because we didn't have a "what we do".
Posted by AA7
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2009
26698 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 2:19 pm to
Not surprised at all Auburn didn’t really go after him. Bruce has decided to focus heavily on GA and if there’s an elite in-state player, he will go after them hard. We’ve only signed two in state players since 2015.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 2:29 pm to
I couldn't remember the last Mobile area kid we signed and boy, that area hasn't had many elite players in a while

2021 - Barry Dunning (Arkansas)
2019 - DeAntoni Gordon (Wichita State, JuCo)
2017 - Tevin Brown (Murray State)
2014 - TJ Lang (Auburn, USF)
2009 - DeMarcus Cousins (Kentucky)
2008 - Nick Williams (Indiana, Ole Miss)

Alabama hasn't signed a kid from Metro Mobile since Mikhail Torrance in the class of 2006 (Semmes).

2006 - Mikhail Torrance (Semmes) (Mary G. Montgomery)
2005 - Brandon Hollinger (Mobile) (LeFlore)
2002 - Kennedy Winston (Prichard) (Blount)
This post was edited on 7/6/21 at 2:41 pm
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13343 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Its perfectly normal and fine though, plenty of really good players on one team that wouldn't work on a different one.


That's what coaches are for. The #77 player in the country can ball. Working on improving a particular kids skillset, and figuring out ways to utilize that skillset to make the team more successful, is the reason coaches make millions of dollars.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

That's what coaches are for. The #77 player in the country can ball. Working on improving a particular kids skillset, and figuring out ways to utilize that skillset to make the team more successful, is the reason coaches make millions of dollars.


Sure but you are still looking for a player that already has a certain skill asset. Muss talked about targeting this guy early cause he had size and could handle the ball very well. He also liked the mismatches he can create.

No reason for a coach to target someone that they will have to coach even harder in a certain area that is demanded in their system when they can find a player that is a better fit.

A player outside the top 100 could be more successful in Oats' system vs Dunning. Same applies in the reverse too.

Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13343 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Sure but you are still looking for a player that already has a certain skill asset. Muss talked about targeting this guy early cause he had size and could handle the ball very well. He also liked the mismatches he can create.


But what basketball coach, regardless of scheme, takes a pass on a player with size, handles, and who creates mismatches? If that isn’t a good fit for your approach to basketball, your approach or philosophy sucks.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

But what basketball coach, regardless of scheme, takes a pass on a player with size, handles, and who creates mismatches? If that isn’t a good fit for your approach to basketball, your approach or philosophy sucks.


Well, speaking as a person who follows one of those teams, it isn't that black or white. If you can't knock down a 25 footer then you create a problem for our offense because you are a non-factor outside the paint. We can accept 1 of those on the floor at a time, generally our big. If you are 6'6 and playing the 3/4, the opponent needs to respect the fact that if you are given a good look from 3 you can make it. Gurley, Ellis, Mikes and Holt are all our 2-4 guys right now. They will all shoot 3's. Even some of our younger bigs, Ambrose-Hylton and Bediako, will be 3 point threats this year or next. That's who we recruit.

That doesn't mean Dunning can't turn into that guy by year 2 or 3, but he's far from it right now. Our focus has been on guys who are 6'6, long, defensive and make outside shots.

Arkansas and Alabama have 80-85% of the same traits they look for in their guys - especially defensively. However, there is a difference in the skillsets that are valued on the offensive side. We place more value on shooters, Arkansas places more values on guys who can exploit one on one via drive and mid range jumper on offense.

My GUESS is that we recruited Dunning because he's a very good player, but that he was not at the top of our list because he checked 4 of the 5 boxes. If we had struck out on the guys who checked 5 of the 5 boxes (which we very well might), we'd probably circle back to Dunning if he was available. However, he checked 5 of 5 boxes for Arkansas, and so they prioritized him. And because they did that and it's a great program, he picked Arkansas, and won't be available if we strike out on the current guys who fit our checklist 100%. Which is a great move on his part.
This post was edited on 7/6/21 at 3:59 pm
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40886 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 4:16 pm to
I’d say that’s a spot on description of what happened. I saw a post on our 247 board from one of our guys that follows basketball recruiting heavily and he echoed that same statement.

He posted “Alabama and Auburn backed off because Dunning doesn't have a great 3-point shot and wouldn't have been a great fit for their 3-pt focused offenses, but he's a match made in heaven for us. He's very athletic and long, can get out and run, guard 1-5, and get to the free throw line. Fans are going to love watching him play.”

I think you and he both nailed it with those comments.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

He posted “Alabama and Auburn backed off because Dunning doesn't have a great 3-point shot and wouldn't have been a great fit for their 3-pt focused offenses, but he's a match made in heaven for us. He's very athletic and long, can get out and run, guard 1-5, and get to the free throw line. Fans are going to love watching him play.”

I think you and he both nailed it with those comments.


And I think the other part there is not that we wouldn't sign Dunning - it's just early and at this point we're chasing other guys who fit more. Dunning has a whole lot of Herb Jones in him (with a better shot at this point in his career, I think). And while Herb's limitations led to some frustration at times, he was a great player last season overall for us - the run and gun 3 point shooting team.

So, it just comes down to early in recruiting you go hard after the dudes that fit everything you want. Dunning was that for Arkansas, not quite that for us. If it's 6 weeks from now and we strike out on our "fits everything we want" and Dunning is still there, I guarantee we make a run at him because he has a lot of other very impressive qualities that any team would want. But he won't be.
This post was edited on 7/6/21 at 4:35 pm
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 4:34 pm to
quote:



But what basketball coach, regardless of scheme, takes a pass on a player with size, handles, and who creates mismatches? If that isn’t a good fit for your approach to basketball, your approach or philosophy sucks.


If he had all of that with no drawbacks, you might be right but that isn't the case. I like this kid alot but lets not act like this is a 5 star, one and done.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 4:39 pm to
quote:


Arkansas and Alabama have 80-85% of the same traits they look for in their guys - especially defensively. However, there is a difference in the skillsets that are valued on the offensive side. We place more value on shooters, Arkansas places more values on guys who can exploit one on one via drive and mid range jumper on offense.


This is actually a great way of putting it. Muss is heavy on analytics just like Oats but doesn't focus nearly as much on the value of shots on the floor. He still wants to space the floor though and pay with a certain level of pace. Their overlap for players is fairly big because of that.
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 7/6/21 at 4:42 pm to
Yep - exactly.

It's pretty awesome that the league has so many great coaches with specific systems and molds of players they want. 10 years ago we were all just signing whatever 4-stars was in our backyard regardless of skillset.
Posted by artompkins
Orange Beach, Al
Member since May 2010
5613 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 3:36 pm to
I live in Baldwin county and work in mobile. It's been talked about for months on the radio how Bama and Auburn were no longer pursuing him as hards as they were. Maybe fit, maybe he let the know where he stood with arky. Who knows. I do know south turned up the heat and lot and that's probably where he will end up when he's in the portal next year.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 7/7/21 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

that's probably where he will end up when he's in the portal next year.


first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter